2019 Cooper-Walsh Colloquium: Urban Intelligence and the Emerging City

The Fordham University School of Law Urban Law Journal presents the:
2019 Cooper-Walsh Colloquium:
Urban Intelligence and the Emerging City
Friday, October 25th, 2019
8:30 A.M. – 5:00 P.M.
CLE Credit Will Be Available

Fordham Law School
Costantino Room (Second Floor)
150 West 62nd Street
New York, NY 10023

REGISTER HERE

Urban intelligence is the operationalization of data in urban spaces through data analytics, machine learning, and artificial intelligence. An ever-growing field, urban intelligence is transforming urban spaces, behavior, and governance. While urban intelligence may empower cities to improve efficiencies in areas such as infrastructure, sustainability, and social services, its increasing use implicates a myriad of rights, including privacy, due process, and equal access. As users and consumers of urban intelligence, urbanites face inevitable growing pains, particularly by way of the use of data which may reflect racial, gender, economic, and ethnic biases of the past and present.

The inevitable growth and consequent reach of urban intelligence necessitates increased investigation into the phenomenon’s regulatory and rights-based consequences. The 2019 Fordham Urban Law Journal Cooper-Walsh Colloquium provides such a forum. Alongside urban intelligence industry leaders — from developers to regulators, and elected officials to academics — the Colloquium promises to be a lively and diverse conversation on the challenges, possibilities, and ways forward in the intersection of urban intelligence and the law.

Panel 1 – The Evolution of Urban Intelligence
Anticipated Start Time: 9:05 A.M.

Urban intelligence is increasingly ubiquitous within urban living and governance. To anticipate what is to come in the arena of urban intelligence, from technological, to regulatory, to social and legal consequences, we must understand the field’s roots. The first panel will provide a common baseline from which Colloquium participants may grow. Broadly speaking, what is urban intelligence? What technological advancements and regulatory schemes have brought us to where we are today? What are, and what have been, the sociological and legal implications of this growth? Who, or what, is at the center of the end product of urban intelligence?

Panel 2 – Urban Intelligence, Governance, and Social Services
Anticipated Start Time: 10:15 A.M.

Machine learning and artificial intelligence are increasingly used in governance decisions, including the allocation of social services and welfare. Cities are uniquely well suited to the collection of such information, and consequent actions based on collected information, due to population density. Predictive analytics contribute to determinations of governance, child welfare and homeless services, as well as to the distribution of food stamps, and other social benefits. What are the legal, social, and regulatory implications of such provisions? What are the possible benefits and challenges?

Panel 3 – Urban Intelligence and Public Safety
Anticipated Start Time: 11:45 A.M.

Urban intelligence allows for the collection and aggregation of data, often collected in the name of public safety and security. Initiatives to combat violence and terrorism include facial recognition, predictive policing, and vulnerability assessment tools, all operating within urban bounds. This panel seeks to understand how personal data is collected, assessed, and the costs and benefits associated with the collection of the data and its application in urban environs. How do cities gather such information? How do they contract with private companies? What kind of oversight exists in such agreements? What rights are implicated? How does an era of combatting domestic terrorism compare in surveillance considerations to one in which foreign terrorism is the primary focus?

Panel 4 – Urban Intelligence and the Built Environment
Anticipated Start Time: 2:00 P.M.

From autonomous vehicles to public broadband, and smart lighting to sensor-powered common payment system applications, urban intelligence is transforming the ways in which urbanites interact with the built environment. This panel will investigate how the cyber environment interacts with the built environment, and the effect of that interaction on engagement of and between individuals, governance structures, and other forms of technology. What do governments hope to achieve through their use? What considerations are contemplated in deploying such technologies? How are privacy considerations, and the preservation of legal rights, weighed against services rendered?

Panel 5 – Closing Plenary: A Comparative Perspective
Anticipated Start Time: 3:30 P.M.

We will close the Colloquium with a plenary, where panelists and attendees will collectively discuss the implementation and ramifications of the use urban intelligence in various cities, while looking to the future of the use of data in urban areas. In having learned of the use of urban intelligence in contexts of the built environment, public safety, governance, and social services, how might a rights-based approach to urban intelligence be implemented? Should it be?

Fordham Law Women 2nd Annual Symposium

This Friday, September 27th, we invite you to attend the Second Annual Fordham Law Women Symposium!

About the Symposium:

Last year, Fordham Law Women hosted its first ever symposium, a collaboration with all six of Fordham Law School’s journals, to commemorate 100 Years of Women at Fordham Law.  As the name of the symposium suggests, Fordham Law Women organized a day of highlighting legal issues that disproportionately affect women, through the lens of each journal’s specialty area.  This year, Fordham Law Women’s second annual symposium will continue the student organization’s mission of bringing important gender and policy issues to the attention of members of the Fordham Law and New York legal community.

Fordham Urban Law Journal is especially proud to team up with the Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law to sponsor a panel on Impact Investing For Women. This panel is scheduled from 1:30 – 2:20 PM.  Don’t miss it!

Impact investing by women and for women is essential to narrowing the gender investing gap. Women have had less of a stake in venture capitalism and angel investments. The gender investment gap is the final frontier in paving the path for the long-term financial welfare and prosperity for women on a global scale. Becoming stakeholders and decision-makers in the global deployment of capital will enable women to shape their destiny — one that, until now, has primarily been decided by men. This panel seeks to address how impact investing with a gender lens supports women-led companies, investors, female entrepreneurs, and social enterprises, and how emerging initiatives can help or hinder this progress.  The panel will also address how investors, men and women included, in general can close the gender investing gap.

Moderator:

Bernice Grant, Senior Director of Entrepreneurial Law Program at Fordham Law School

Bernice Grant is the Senior Director of the Entrepreneurial Law Program and Founding Director of the Entrepreneurial Law Clinic at Fordham University School of Law.

Before joining Fordham, she was the Clinical Supervisor and Lecturer of the Entrepreneurship Legal Clinic at the University of Pennsylvania Law School. She previously taught at New York University School of Law, where she was an Acting Assistant Professor and Associate Director of the Lawyering Program. Before entering academia, she was a Corporate Associate at Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP. She has also worked as Of Counsel to a transactional boutique law firm, Bryant Rabbino LLP.

She received her JD from Harvard Law School, and an L.L.M. from New York University School of Law. Before becoming an attorney, she received a B.S., magna cum laude, and M.S. in Accounting from Wake Forest University School of Business, then worked as a Certified Public Accountant at an international accounting firm.

 Speakers:

Ana Demel, Adjunct Professor of Law and Partner, Vice-chair of the board of Pro Mujer, Inc. and former partner at Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLC

Ana Demel teaches The Law and Business of Social Enterprise, Financing Development, and Project Finance at NYU School of Law; she is a member of the board of Pro Mujer. Prior to 2009, Ana was a partner at the international law firm of Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton, LLP where her practice focused on international financing and business transactions, particularly in Latin America. At Cleary Gottlieb she advised private and public sector clients on a variety of transactions, including structured finance and project finance as well as sovereign debt restructurings and mergers and acquisitions. In addition, she was involved in pro bono matters involving microfinance.

Mary Rose Brusewitz, Partner-in-Charge at Clark Hill PLC and Pro Bono Supervising Attorney at New York University School of Law

Mary Rose Brusewitz is a member in charge of Clark Hill’s New York office. She concentrates her practice on international transactions involving Latin America, Africa, Asia, India, Europe, and the US.

Brusewitz is active in impact investing, sustainability, accountability, ESG/SDG compliance, and corporate governance. She represents a provider of currency hedging to the impact space, as well as several funds active in investing debt and equity in sectors including microfinancing, solar energy, retail, sanitation, and housing. She has substantial experience in emerging markets development and finance. Areas include infrastructure, water, power, oil and gas, renewable energy, and mining. Her expertise includes structuring, implementing, administering, and exiting impact debt and equity investments; coordinating groups of investors, including DFIs, privately managed funds, commercial banks, for-profits, and nonprofits; blended capital structures; project and structured financing; private equity; cross-border investments; joint ventures; restructurings; workouts; insolvencies; and dispute resolution and mediation.

Brusewitz contributes substantial time and expertise on a pro bono basis for impact clients. She was a compliance panel member and panel chair of the independent accountability mechanism of the Inter-American Development Bank. She is a pro bono supervising attorney at the International Transactions Clinic at New York University School of Law.

Loretta McCarthy, Managing Partner of Angel Network at Golden Seeds

Loretta McCarthy is Managing Partner, responsible for the Golden Seeds angel network nationwide, including member cultivation, orientation, and engagement.  Golden Seeds is a New York-based private equity fund focused on early-stage women-led businesses. It operates with the goal of raising substantial capital for women entrepreneurs and to encourage both women and men to become active venture investors, by providing a venue where they could learn and work together.

She is a frequent speaker – in the United States and internationally – about early-stage investing, women entrepreneurs and gender diversity. Prior to Golden Seeds, she was Executive Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer at OppenheimerFunds, a leading asset management firm, as well as Vice President of Marketing at American Express. She brings to this role deep experience in strategy, marketing, product development, public affairs, and corporate communications. She has extensive experience serving on boards of directors of corporations and non-profit organizations.

See you there!

Volume 46, Book 4: Human Impacts of Criminalization and Collateral Consequences

ARTICLES

Barbers, Caregivers, and the “Disciplinary Subject”: Occupational Licensure for People with Criminal Justice Backgrounds in the United States
Alec C. Ewald

Undoing the Bail Myth: Pretrial Reforms to End Mass Incarceration
Insha Rahman

ESSAYS

Diary of a Civil Public Defender: Critical Lessons for Achieving Transformative Change on Behalf of Communities
Runa Rajagopal

NOTES

The “White” to Bear Arms: How Immunity Provisions in Stand Your Ground Statutes Lead to An Unequal Application of The Law for Black Gun Owners
Victoria Bell

 

Volume 46, Book 3: Remodeling Sanctuary: Urban Immigration in a New Era

ARTICLES
Contextualizing Sanctuary Policy Development in the United States: Conceptual and Constitutional Underpinnings, 1979 to 2018
Allan Colbern, Melanie Amoroso-Pohl, & Courtney Gutiérrez

Unsettling Immigration Laws: Settler Colonialism and the U.S. Immigration Legal System
Monika Batra Kashyap

ESSAYS
Universities as Vehicles for Immigrant Integration
Kit Johnson

Applying the U.S. Constitution Abroad, from the Era of the U.S. Founding to the Modern Age
Alina Veneziano

NOTES
Separate But (Still Un)equal: Challenging School Segregation in New York City
Gabrielle Kornblau

Weaning Drug Manufacturers Off Their Painkiller: Creating an Exception to the Learned Intermediary Doctrine in Light of the Opioid Crisis
Max Roberts

Second Circuit, Eastern District of Michigan, and Utah Court of Appeals Cite the ULJ

The Second Circuit recently cited to Mary Pennisi’s article, A Herculean Leap for the Hard Case of Post-Acquisition Claims: Interpreting Fair Housing Act Section 3604(B) After Modesto, in its opinion for Francis v. King Park Manor, Inc., No. 15-1823-cv, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 6486, at *15 n.6 (2d Cir. Mar. 4, 2019).  This article from Book 37.4 was cited as scholarship confirming that §§ 3604(b) and 3617 of the Fair Housing Act encompass post-acquisition claims.

The Eastern District of Michigan cited to a student note by Rebecca Laitman from Book 45.3Fourth Amendment Flagrancy: What It Is, and What It Is Not, in its opinion for United States v. Gordon, 346 F. Supp. 3d 999, 1007 n.7 (E.D. Mich. 2018).

The Utah Court of Appeals recently cited to Michal Gilad, Abraham Gutman, and Stephen P. Chawaga’s article from Book 46.1The Snowball Effect of Crime and Violence: Measuring the Triple-C Impact, in its opinion for Interest of C.C.W., 2019 UT App 34, ¶ 20 & n.6.

 

Volume 45, Book 4: Taking a Bite out of the Big Apple: A Conversation About Urban Food Policy (Colloquium)

Forging Food Justice Through Cooperatives in New York City
Dan DePasquale, Surbhi Sarang, and Natalie Bump Vena

Ten Years of Food Policy Governance in New York City: Lessons for the Next Decade
Nicholas Freudenberg, Nevin Cohen, Janet Poppendieck, and Craig Willingham

Food Law Gone Wild: The Law of Foraging
Baylen J. Linnekin

Big Food and Soda Versus Public Health: Industry Litigation Against Local Government Regulations to Promote Healthy Diets
Sarah A. Roache, Charles Platkin, Lawrence O. Gostin, and Cara Kaplan

Let Them Eat Kale: The Misplaced Narrative of Food Access
Nathan A. Rosenberg and Nevin Cohen

Volume 45, Book 3: The Realities of Renting

Articles

Infill: New Housing for Twenty-First Century America
Paul Boudreaux

A Place to Call Home: Tenant Blacklisting and the Denial of Opportunity
Paula A. Franzese

Notes

“We Know Not Where We Go”: Protecting Digital Privacy in New York City’s Municipal Wi-Fi Network
Eric Hornbeck

Biting the Hand that Feeds: Third Party Appeals and NLRA Objectives
Matthew Knowles

Fourth Amendment Flagrancy: What It Is, and What It Is Not
Rebecca Laitman

For Clarity’s Sake: Redefining the Knowing and Voluntary Standard in Severance Agreements
Samantha Padilla

Collaboration Versus Competition in Health Care: The Role of State Action Antitrust Immunity in New York’s Medicaid Reform Initiative
Zachary E. Sproull

Volume XLVI Editorial Board and Staff

Editor-in-Chief: Miyoshie Lamothe-Aime

Managing Editor: Alexa Savino
Business Editor: Tanyell Cooke
Senior Articles Editor: Nadav Pearl
Online Managing Editor: Samantha Frankel
Writing and Research Editor: Alex Fagella
Cooper-Walsh Editor: Ruhi Behal
Symposium Editor: Traci Krasne

Notes and Articles Editor: Andrew Debter
Notes and Articles Editor: Yongsun Kwon
Notes and Articles Editor: Eric Hornbeck
Notes and Articles Editor: Jordan Horowitz
Notes and Articles Editor: Milan Sova
Notes and Articles Editor: Denae Kassotis
Notes and Articles Editor: Samantha Zuckerman Read more

Wyoming Supreme Court Cites the ULJ

 

The Wyoming Supreme Court recently cited an article from Book 45.1: Juvenile (In)Justice–Alice Reichman Hoesterey’s Confusion in Montgomery‘s Wake: State Responses, the Mandates of Montgomery, and Why a Complete Categorical Ban on Life Without Parole for Juveniles Is the Only Constitutional Option–multiple times in its opinion for Davis v. Wyoming, concerning the appeal of a sentencing decision. View the article here, the full book here, and the opinion here (via FindLaw)!

1 2 3