Abstract: In Motorola Mobility, LLC v. AU Optronics Corporation, the Seventh Circuit dismissed Motorola’s Sherman Act claims under the Foreign Trade Antitrust Improvement Act. In doing so, they held that Motorola’s American parent corporation was a separate entity from their foreign subsidiaries, and thus barred from bringing suit under the indirect purchaser doctrine. The effect of the Seventh Circuit’s decision precluded injured purchasers from recovering damages under the Sherman Act—Motorola’s subsidiaries could not sue because their injuries occurred abroad, while Motorola could not sue because it did not make direct purchases from the antitrust violators. Courts have often considered a…
Author: Catherine E. Cognetti
Abstract: With record-low interest rates, private equity has seen unparalleled activity in recent years. Though thriving, private equity firms have proved to be guilty of overleveraging their portfolio companies as general partners. The results of overleveraging have been varied. At one end, firms seem dedicated to a portfolio company’s restructuring, investing further and pledging more capital in hopes of future growth. At the other end, firms wishing to exit their investment, redeem debt previously given to a portfolio company at a premium and engage in a quick sale thereafter, leaving that company unable to satisfy its future obligations. Firms that…
To download a full PDF of this article, click here.
In 2010, Congress enacted the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act in response to the stock market collapse and economic downturn as well as the Bernard Madoff scandal and other well-publicized frauds perpetrated against investors. Among its numerous provisions, the Dodd-Frank Act amended the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to add a new section—Section 21F—entitled “Securities Whistleblower Incentives and Protection.” The Dodd-Frank Act also directed the Securities and Exchange Commission to establish an Office of the Whistleblower to administer the provisions of the new section. The Commission subsequently adopted regulations that went into effect on August 12, 2011…
Symposium WELCOME AND INTRODUCTORY REMARKS Matthew Diller Fordham University School of Law PANEL: ARE WE READY FOR THE NEXT FINANCIAL CRISIS? MODERATOR Richard Squire Fordham University School of Law PANELISTS Eric F. Grossman Morgan Stanley Richard K. Kim Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz KEYNOTE ADDRESS Daniel M. Gallagher, Jr. Former Commissioner, United States Securities and Exchange Commission To download a full PDF of this article, click here
Abstract: In the spring of 2015, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission brought two significant Foreign Corrupt Practices Act cases involving gifts, entertainment, and travel. The SEC brought the case of In the Matter of FLIR Systems involving FCPA violations concerning the financing of a “world tour” of personal travel for government officials. The SEC then filed the case of In the Matter of BHP Billiton involving FCPA violations concerning the sponsored attendance of foreign officials at the 2008 Summer Olympics in Beijing. These landmark cases affirm previous guidance by the Securities and Exchange Commission and the United States…
Abstract: It has been over fifty years since the United States Securities and Exchange Commission held that insider trading on material, nonpublic information is illegal, and despite the passage of the Insider Trading Sanctions Act in 1984, Insider Trading and Securities Fraud Enforcement Act in 1988, and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, there is still no clear definition of “material, nonpublic information.” This Article argues that the ambiguity of what constitutes illegal insider information enables corporate insiders to engage in profitable transactions without legal consequences. Furthermore, we argue and provide evidence that the necessity of showing a tipper’s personal benefit…
Abstract: Debt settlement companies can offer a simple and valuable means of resolving consumer debt. However, many debt settlement companies choose to engage in unfair, deceptive, or abusive acts and practices at the expense of desperate debt-ridden consumers, making it an unrealistic option of debt relief. Due to the unfair, deceptive, and abusive acts and practices by some debt settlement companies, the regulatory regime has been trending towards increased regulation. However, the lack of enforcement and severity of existing regulations causes persistent problems in the debt settlement industry, resulting in increased consumer debt instead of consumer debt relief. This Note…
Abstract: Imprudent underwriting and mortgage origination in the years leading up to the Global Financial Crisis of 2007 and 2008 was determined to be one of its predominant causes. As a result, partly in an effort to protect consumers and ensure that lending institutions did not relapse into poor mortgage origination practices, Congress passed the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. This Note examines the qualified mortgage rule promulgated by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Act. This rule is intended to ensure that borrowers receive loans that are not unfair, deceptive, or abusive, and…
https://vimeo.com/162730171 On April 11, 2016, the Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law co-hosted the 16th Annual Albert A. DeStefano Lecture on Corporate, Securities and Financial Law with the Corporate Law Center at Fordham Law School. This years lecture features Chancellor Andre G. Bouchard, who elaborated on his In Re Trulia, Inc. Stockholder Litig. decision and provided insight into the future of disclosure settlement cases. On January 22, 2016, Chancellor Bouchard issued an opinion [1] rejecting the proposed settlement in the litigation arising out of Zillow’s acquisition of Trulia. Four Trulia stockholders filed complaints shortly after the proposed merger was announced,…