Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Return to Fordham Law School
    X (Twitter) Facebook LinkedIn Instagram RSS
    Fordham Law News
    • Home
    • Law School News
    • In the News
    • Fordham Lawyer
    • Insider
      • Announcements
      • Class Notes
      • In Memoriam
    • For the Media
      • Media Contacts
    • News by Topic
      • Business and Financial Law
      • Clinics
      • Intellectual Property and Information Law
      • International and Human Rights Law
      • Legal Ethics and Professional Practice
      • National Security
      • Public Interest and Service
    Return to Fordham Law School
    X (Twitter) Facebook LinkedIn Instagram RSS
    Fordham Law News
    You are at:Home»Faculty»The World Has A Right To Know About Trump’s War Powers

    The World Has A Right To Know About Trump’s War Powers

    0
    By Newsroom on February 20, 2018 Faculty, In the News, Transition to Trump

    David A. Andelman, visiting scholar at the Center on National Security at Fordham Law, wrote an op-ed for CNN about President Trump’s secret war powers memo.

    A key question of who has the right to declare war — Donald Trump or Congress (as the US Constitution demands) — is quietly playing out these days, largely out of sight.

    The outcome of this potentially monumental dispute could keep the world safe or plunge it into sudden and unexpected conflict — with catastrophic consequences.

    Since 9/11, American presidents have been operating under the assumption that they could effectively take the nation to war with virtual impunity. Now, Donald Trump has tried to enshrine this concept in a secret memo without any approval by Congress.

    Senator Tim Kaine (D-VA) unveiled the existence of the memo earlier this month, when he asked Secretary of State Rex Tillerson to release the document. So far, neither Tillerson nor Congress has responded.

    …

    The President has already opened the question of whether he’d violated the limit of his war-making powers by his military actions in Syria.

    Last April, following evidence of the use of chemical weapons against his own people by Bashar al-Assad, Trump ordered a strike by 59 Tomahawk cruise missiles that seemed to have had little lasting effect beyond solidifying Russian support of the Syrian dictator.

    Trump’s action was in sharp contrast to that of President Obama, who threatened to launch a strike on Syria for similar use of such weapons but backed off at the last minute in the absence of congressional authorization, which he recognized he was most unlikely to receive.

    In each case, the presidents had set up a “red line” which, if the enemy crossed it, would be met by a sharp military response.

    I’m heading up a project at the Center on National Security of Fordham Law School on red lines and their anatomy — when they might be effectively used and when they are grossly misused. Obama’s refusal to react to Syria’s abuse of chemical weapons called into question the red line he had established, a line that Assad leaped across with impunity since he was met with no military response.

    …

    In the critical case of North Korea, Ackerman contends the clock started when President Trump declared the existence of such a danger in a speech to the United Nations last September 19, which would mean his opportunity to bloody Kim’s nose, without Congressional approval, ran out on November 18.

    Of course, if the North Korean despot were to launch his own offensive attack on any American facility or territory, all such restraints are instantly removed and Trump would have the right to respond, as he has threatened, with full “fire and fury.”

    Enter, now, the secret memo that may give Trump broad authority to act on any whim, a document to which only a small cadre in his administration are privy.

    Read full op-ed.

     

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

    Related Posts

    The Big Idea: All Lawyers Should Be Climate-Informed Lawyers

    Professor Catherine Powell Selected for Prestigious Princeton Fellowship

    Bloomberg Law: Prof. Bruce Green Says Rules of Professional Conduct Will Be Tested as KPMG Law Eyes National Reach

    Comments are closed.

    • The Big Idea
    September 8, 2025

    The Big Idea: All Lawyers Should Be Climate-Informed Lawyers

    August 5, 2025

    The Big Idea: Who Counts (and Who Doesn’t) in the U.S. Census 

    March 31, 2025

    The Big Idea: Local Politics, Reform Prosecutors, and Reshaping Mass Incarceration

    March 3, 2025

    The Big Idea: Forced Labor, Global Supply Chains, and Workers’ Rights

    READ MORE

    About

    Fordham University - The Jesuit University of New York

    Founded in 1841, Fordham is the Jesuit University of New York, offering exceptional education distinguished by the Jesuit tradition to more than 15,100 students in its four undergraduate colleges and its six graduate and professional schools.
    Connect With Fordham
    © 2025 ThemeSphere. Designed by ThemeSphere.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.