Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Return to Fordham Law School
    X (Twitter) Facebook LinkedIn Instagram RSS
    Fordham Law News
    • Home
    • Law School News
    • In the News
    • Fordham Lawyer
    • Insider
      • Announcements
      • Class Notes
      • In Memoriam
    • For the Media
      • Media Contacts
    • News by Topic
      • Business and Financial Law
      • Clinics
      • Intellectual Property and Information Law
      • International and Human Rights Law
      • Legal Ethics and Professional Practice
      • National Security
      • Public Interest and Service
    Return to Fordham Law School
    X (Twitter) Facebook LinkedIn Instagram RSS
    Fordham Law News
    You are at:Home»Faculty»Olympic Oversight Bill Lacks Muscle To Achieve Grand Goals

    Olympic Oversight Bill Lacks Muscle To Achieve Grand Goals

    0
    By Newsroom on August 6, 2019 Faculty, In the News

    Professor Mark Conrad provided his thoughts for a Law360 article on recent legislation aimed at increasing Congressional oversight over the committee that governs U.S. Olympic teams.

    The Empowering Olympic and Amateur Athletes Act of 2019 would allow Congress to pass a “joint resolution” to dissolve the board of directors of the U.S. Olympic & Paralympic Committee and revoke the certification of an individual Olympic sport national governing body if lawmakers believe they are not upholding duties to promote Olympic sports and the safety of athletes.

    The law would further require the USOPC to provide $20 million in annual funding to the U.S. Center for SafeSport, an independent organization tasked with stopping abuse in Olympic sports. Since being officially authorized by Congress in 2017, the organization has complained that it has been overwhelmed with abuse allegations.

    Yet international sports legal experts say that while the new bill, introduced by U.S. Sens. Jerry Moran, R-Kan., and Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., includes some long-overdue reforms, it does not go far enough with oversight of the U.S. Olympic sports organizations and fails to provide adequate funding for the Center for SafeSport.

    “It is a very, very good first step; it addresses some of the core issues that are so endemic with these athletic organizations,” said Mark Conrad, a law and ethics professor at Fordham University. “Ideally, it could go further in terms of transparency requirements and independent ethics watchdogs. But I think it is certainly a long-delayed step in the right direction.”

    Read full article.

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

    Related Posts

    Professor Catherine Powell Selected for Prestigious Princeton Fellowship

    Bloomberg Law: Prof. Bruce Green Says Rules of Professional Conduct Will Be Tested as KPMG Law Eyes National Reach

    Dan’s Papers: Prof. Jerry Goldfeder Quizzes Readers on New York Politics

    Comments are closed.

    • The Big Idea
    August 5, 2025

    The Big Idea: Who Counts (and Who Doesn’t) in the U.S. Census 

    March 31, 2025

    The Big Idea: Local Politics, Reform Prosecutors, and Reshaping Mass Incarceration

    March 3, 2025

    The Big Idea: Forced Labor, Global Supply Chains, and Workers’ Rights

    November 6, 2024

    The Big Idea: Partisanship, Perception, and Prosecutorial Power

    READ MORE

    About

    Fordham University - The Jesuit University of New York

    Founded in 1841, Fordham is the Jesuit University of New York, offering exceptional education distinguished by the Jesuit tradition to more than 15,100 students in its four undergraduate colleges and its six graduate and professional schools.
    Connect With Fordham
    © 2025 ThemeSphere. Designed by ThemeSphere.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.