Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Return to Fordham Law School
    X (Twitter) Facebook LinkedIn Instagram RSS
    Fordham Law News
    • Home
    • Law School News
    • In the News
    • Fordham Lawyer
    • Insider
      • Announcements
      • Class Notes
      • In Memoriam
    • For the Media
      • Media Contacts
    • News by Topic
      • Business and Financial Law
      • Clinics
      • Intellectual Property and Information Law
      • International and Human Rights Law
      • Legal Ethics and Professional Practice
      • National Security
      • Public Interest and Service
    Return to Fordham Law School
    X (Twitter) Facebook LinkedIn Instagram RSS
    Fordham Law News
    You are at:Home»Faculty»Denno’s Firing Squad Article Cited in Virginia Death Penalty Case

    Denno’s Firing Squad Article Cited in Virginia Death Penalty Case

    0
    By on January 4, 2017 Deborah Denno, Faculty, Law School News

    A Virginia death row inmate scheduled to die this month by lethal injection cited Fordham Law Professor Deborah W. Denno’s work in his appeal to the United States Supreme Court to have a firing squad be his execution method.

    Ricky Jovan Gray’s appeal cites Denno’s article The Firing Squad as “A Known and Available Alternative Method of Execution” Post-Glossip to make his argument that a firing squad is an available alternative execution method in America, and would reduce his risk of pain when compared to the state’s proposed three-drug lethal injection cocktail featuring compounded midazolam, a never-before-used version of the controversial sedative. Gray’s execution is scheduled for Jan. 18.

    The Supreme Court ruled in 2015 in the matter of Glossip v. Gross that the state of Oklahoma could use midazolam as part of a three-drug cocktail in the planned execution of convicted killer Richard Glossip. Gray’s attorneys contend that the compounding formula raises “enormous risk that the drugs will be ineffective, sub-potent, expired, or contaminated,” and point to recent botched executions in Alabama, Arizona, Ohio, and Oklahoma as proof of the risk posed by midazolam.

    Denno, who has written about the constitutionality of execution methods, especially lethal injection, for 26 years, described recent botches with midazolam since 2014 as “the most egregious” since lethal injection replaced electrocution as this country’s standard execution method.

    “States are loath to change because, if they change to another drug or another method, that acknowledges there is a problem with the method,” Denno said. “States don’t want to concede they’re having challenges or what they’re doing is unconstitutional, because that is a threat to the death penalty itself.”

    Virginia law calls for the inmate to choose between lethal injection and electrocution. Both options would amount to “cruel and unusual punishment” under the Eighth Amendment, Gray’s attorneys assert, and, as such, he wishes to be put to death by firing squad, a method available in Utah and Oklahoma. America’s most recent execution by firing squad occurred in 2010 in Utah (Ronnie Lee Gardner).

    “Even if midazolam works sometimes, there’s a high risk of it not working properly,” Denno said, noting around seven percent of lethal injection procedures are botched. “Firing squad, at least in modern times since 1976, has worked every time.”

    Increasingly, the 31 pro-death penalty states are struggling to acquire the drugs necessary to carry out the injections, leading to a tremendous death row backlog.

    A total of 20 executions were carried out in five states in 2016, the lowest number of executions since the death penalty was reinstated in 1976, according to the Death Penalty Information Center. Meanwhile, 2,905 inmates were on death row as of July 1, 2016.

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

    Related Posts

    Fordham Law Kicks Off the Fall 2025 Semester, Welcoming 447 New Students

    Litigation and Corporate Law: Meet Adetoun Adelana ’27

    Fordham Law Students Expand Their Legal Horizons in South Korea

    Comments are closed.

    • The Big Idea
    August 5, 2025

    The Big Idea: Who Counts (and Who Doesn’t) in the U.S. Census 

    March 31, 2025

    The Big Idea: Local Politics, Reform Prosecutors, and Reshaping Mass Incarceration

    March 3, 2025

    The Big Idea: Forced Labor, Global Supply Chains, and Workers’ Rights

    November 6, 2024

    The Big Idea: Partisanship, Perception, and Prosecutorial Power

    READ MORE

    About

    Fordham University - The Jesuit University of New York

    Founded in 1841, Fordham is the Jesuit University of New York, offering exceptional education distinguished by the Jesuit tradition to more than 15,100 students in its four undergraduate colleges and its six graduate and professional schools.
    Connect With Fordham
    © 2025 ThemeSphere. Designed by ThemeSphere.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.