Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Return to Fordham Law School
    X (Twitter) Facebook LinkedIn Instagram RSS
    Fordham Law News
    • Home
    • Law School News
    • In the News
    • Fordham Lawyer
    • Insider
      • Announcements
      • Class Notes
      • In Memoriam
    • For the Media
      • Media Contacts
    • News by Topic
      • Business and Financial Law
      • Clinics
      • Intellectual Property and Information Law
      • International and Human Rights Law
      • Legal Ethics and Professional Practice
      • National Security
      • Public Interest and Service
    Return to Fordham Law School
    X (Twitter) Facebook LinkedIn Instagram RSS
    Fordham Law News
    You are at:Home»In the News»Is a second execution effort cruel?

    Is a second execution effort cruel?

    0
    By on September 19, 2009 Deborah Denno, Faculty, In the News

    Deborah Denno discusses in the Los Angeles Times the legal precedent behind a second execution attempt in Ohio and whether it would violate the 8th Amendment prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment.

    Only once before has a state’s execution failed, legal scholars say. In 1946, 17-year-old Willie Francis walked away from Louisiana’s “Gruesome Gertie” electric chair after a 2,500-volt current coursed through his body.

     “The issue with Willie Francis was, can you re-execute him, or would that be cruel and unusual punishment or dou-ble jeopardy?” said Deborah Denno, a Fordham University law professor and death penalty expert.

    A divided high court decided in 1947 that Louisiana could lawfully subject Francis to execution again. A second electrocution killed him a year and three days after the first attempt.

    “But so many aspects of that case are so outdated or so specific to Willie Francis and that time that even though it is entrenched precedent with the U.S. Supreme Court and frequently cited, one would look at the Broom case very differently,” said Denno, whose writings on execution methods were cited by the U.S. Supreme Court majority in last year’s decision upholding the constitutionality of lethal injection in Kentucky.

    This story originally ran in the Los Angeles Times. 

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

    Related Posts

    Bloomberg Law: Prof. Bruce Green Says Rules of Professional Conduct Will Be Tested as KPMG Law Eyes National Reach

    Dan’s Papers: Prof. Jerry Goldfeder Quizzes Readers on New York Politics

    Parriva: Prof. John Pfaff Argues ICE Will Not Reach Its Hiring Goals

    Comments are closed.

    • The Big Idea
    August 5, 2025

    The Big Idea: Who Counts (and Who Doesn’t) in the U.S. Census 

    March 31, 2025

    The Big Idea: Local Politics, Reform Prosecutors, and Reshaping Mass Incarceration

    March 3, 2025

    The Big Idea: Forced Labor, Global Supply Chains, and Workers’ Rights

    November 6, 2024

    The Big Idea: Partisanship, Perception, and Prosecutorial Power

    READ MORE

    About

    Fordham University - The Jesuit University of New York

    Founded in 1841, Fordham is the Jesuit University of New York, offering exceptional education distinguished by the Jesuit tradition to more than 15,100 students in its four undergraduate colleges and its six graduate and professional schools.
    Connect With Fordham
    © 2025 ThemeSphere. Designed by ThemeSphere.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.