Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Return to Fordham Law School
    X (Twitter) Facebook LinkedIn Instagram RSS
    Fordham Law News
    • Home
    • Law School News
    • In the News
    • Fordham Lawyer
    • Insider
      • Announcements
      • Class Notes
      • In Memoriam
    • For the Media
      • Media Contacts
    • News by Topic
      • Business and Financial Law
      • Clinics
      • Intellectual Property and Information Law
      • International and Human Rights Law
      • Legal Ethics and Professional Practice
      • National Security
      • Public Interest and Service
    Return to Fordham Law School
    X (Twitter) Facebook LinkedIn Instagram RSS
    Fordham Law News
    You are at:Home»In the News»As Teresa Lewis faces execution, death penalty expert says evidence doesn’t support lethal sentence

    As Teresa Lewis faces execution, death penalty expert says evidence doesn’t support lethal sentence

    0
    By on September 23, 2010 Deborah Denno, Faculty, In the News

    Deborah Denno comments to the Daily News about the execution of Teresa Lewis, who plead guilty in 2010 to plotting to kill her husband and stepson for the life insurance money.

    “I think the courts haven’t taken into account all the factors,” Deborah Denno, a professor at Fordham Law School, told the Daily News.

    One of the nation’s leading death penalty experts, Denno argues the evidence clearly shows Teresa Lewis, convicted in 2003, could not have been the devilish mastermind of an elaborate double murder.

    “The crime’s horrible, but there are a lot of these horrible crimes, and you don’t have the death penalty,” she said.

    Lewis’ role in the brutal slayings cannot be denied, Denno said, but executing her is “disproportionate” compared to her role in the murders.

    “Her two male co-conspirators, who actually carried out the murders, got life sentences,” she said.

    But as Denno explains, reversing a death penalty sentence is no easy task.

    “You can have the best lawyer, and Ms. Lewis has a wonderful law firm behind her, but it’s still very difficult,” she said.

    Appellate courts more often than not adhere to the original findings in the case, often despite new evidence, Denno said. In the case of Teresa Lewis, that evidence included an exam that showed she was borderline mentally challenged, and that one of the men convicted in the murders wrote in a letter that he had in fact manipulated her to go along with the crime.

    “Death penalty cases are treated differently,” the law professor said. “Reversals are very hard.”

    Denno also suggests the mere fact that she is a women lends credence to the suggestion she could not have been the mastermind of the murders.

    “If you’re looking at the odds, that’s the typical scenario,” Denno said. “People generally follow gender roles, and homicides are not an exception.”

    Even the suggestion that Lewis was not the same person she was prior to the killings did not help her case. A model prisoner, Lewis found religion in jail and is known to sing gospels in her cell, but that did not help to sway the courts or Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell.

    “Most prisoners change,” Denno said. “That’s not unusual… [but courts]really look at what you did at the time, and the punishment you got then.”

    With her options exhausted, there is little at this stage that can be done to prevent Lewis from facing lethal injection. However, Denno believes her case is not exactly over.

    “I think this is a case that upsets a lot of people,” she said. It will likely serve as “one chip against the death penalty.”

    The uproar, which has drawn the attention of author John Grisham and even Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, will undoubtedly spark debate regarding the future use of the severe sentencing.

    “In Teresa Lewis’ case, I think there’ll be further discussion,” Denno said. “Her name is not going to be forgotten.”

    Read the entire Daily News story.

     

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

    Related Posts

    Professor Catherine Powell Selected for Prestigious Princeton Fellowship

    Bloomberg Law: Prof. Bruce Green Says Rules of Professional Conduct Will Be Tested as KPMG Law Eyes National Reach

    Dan’s Papers: Prof. Jerry Goldfeder Quizzes Readers on New York Politics

    Comments are closed.

    • The Big Idea
    August 5, 2025

    The Big Idea: Who Counts (and Who Doesn’t) in the U.S. Census 

    March 31, 2025

    The Big Idea: Local Politics, Reform Prosecutors, and Reshaping Mass Incarceration

    March 3, 2025

    The Big Idea: Forced Labor, Global Supply Chains, and Workers’ Rights

    November 6, 2024

    The Big Idea: Partisanship, Perception, and Prosecutorial Power

    READ MORE

    About

    Fordham University - The Jesuit University of New York

    Founded in 1841, Fordham is the Jesuit University of New York, offering exceptional education distinguished by the Jesuit tradition to more than 15,100 students in its four undergraduate colleges and its six graduate and professional schools.
    Connect With Fordham
    © 2025 ThemeSphere. Designed by ThemeSphere.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.