Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Return to Fordham Law School
    X (Twitter) Facebook LinkedIn Instagram RSS
    Fordham Law News
    • Home
    • Law School News
    • In the News
    • Fordham Lawyer
    • Insider
      • Announcements
      • Class Notes
      • In Memoriam
    • For the Media
      • Media Contacts
    • News by Topic
      • Business and Financial Law
      • Clinics
      • Intellectual Property and Information Law
      • International and Human Rights Law
      • Legal Ethics and Professional Practice
      • National Security
      • Public Interest and Service
    Return to Fordham Law School
    X (Twitter) Facebook LinkedIn Instagram RSS
    Fordham Law News
    You are at:Home»In the News»Supreme Court Allows Use of Controversial Sedative for Lethal Injection: What This Means for the Death Penalty

    Supreme Court Allows Use of Controversial Sedative for Lethal Injection: What This Means for the Death Penalty

    0
    By on June 29, 2015 Deborah Denno, Faculty, In the News

    Deborah Denno, the Arthur A. McGivney Professor of Law at Fordham University School of Law and a leading expert on the legal issues surrounding the death penalty, spoke to Yahoo about the Supreme Court’s Glossip v. Gross ruling. The Supreme Court’s 5-4 ruling allows states to use midazolam, a drug used during botched executions the past two years.

    “It’s like rooting through your kitchen cabinets looking for an aspirin and taking anything that happens to be there,” says Denno of the use of midazolam as the sedative used in current three-drug-cocktail lethal injection administration. It is simply what these states have “turned to out of desperation just to keep executions going.”

    Part of the problem with midazolam, Denno noted, is states have no way to test its effectiveness.

    “It’s an evil call,” says Denno regarding lethal injection, adding that it’s a “human experiment because we don’t know how it’s going to work.”

    “You can’t use the second or third drugs [in the three-drug protocol]on an animal in this country” when putting it down, adds Denno. “The American Veterinary Association will not allow that. But we allow it for human beings. So, we can’t even test these drugs on animals if we wanted to, but we test them on human beings every time we execute people.”

    Read Yahoo‘s full article here.

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

    Related Posts

    Bloomberg Law: Prof. Bruce Green on Whether Judges Can Face Sanctions for the Kind of Errors They Find in Lawyers’ Work

    The New York Times: Prof. Bruce Green on Conflict of Interest in Epstein Scandal

    NBC New York: Prof. Martin S. Flaherty Provides Legal Opinion on Whether President Can Take Over New York City

    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.

    • The Big Idea
    March 31, 2025

    The Big Idea: Local Politics, Reform Prosecutors, and Reshaping Mass Incarceration

    March 3, 2025

    The Big Idea: Forced Labor, Global Supply Chains, and Workers’ Rights

    November 6, 2024

    The Big Idea: Partisanship, Perception, and Prosecutorial Power

    October 3, 2024

    The Big Idea: How a Franchising Model Can Transform Worker Cooperatives

    READ MORE

    About

    Fordham University - The Jesuit University of New York

    Founded in 1841, Fordham is the Jesuit University of New York, offering exceptional education distinguished by the Jesuit tradition to more than 15,100 students in its four undergraduate colleges and its six graduate and professional schools.
    Connect With Fordham
    © 2025 ThemeSphere. Designed by ThemeSphere.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.