Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Return to Fordham Law School
    X (Twitter) Facebook LinkedIn Instagram RSS
    Fordham Law News
    • Home
    • Law School News
    • In the News
    • Fordham Lawyer
    • Insider
      • Announcements
      • Class Notes
      • In Memoriam
    • For the Media
      • Media Contacts
    • News by Topic
      • Business and Financial Law
      • Clinics
      • Intellectual Property and Information Law
      • International and Human Rights Law
      • Legal Ethics and Professional Practice
      • National Security
      • Public Interest and Service
    Return to Fordham Law School
    X (Twitter) Facebook LinkedIn Instagram RSS
    Fordham Law News
    You are at:Home»Editor's Picks»Edelman: Fantasy Sports Sites Should Stop and Sue

    Edelman: Fantasy Sports Sites Should Stop and Sue

    0
    By on November 16, 2015 Editor's Picks, Faculty, Law School News

    DraftKings executives are playing a risky game with potential criminal implications should they continue to offer New Yorkers daily fantasy sports contests in defiance of Attorney General Eric Schneiderman’s cease-and-desist letter, Fordham Law Adjunct Professor Marc Edelman said this week.

    The Boston-based web site plans to continue offering daily contests to its 500,000 New York customers while seeking a ruling in court on whether daily fantasy sports violate the state’s illegal gambling statute, as Schneiderman alleges. Meanwhile, DraftKings’ chief rival, FanDuel, has temporarily stopped servicing its 600,000 New York customers while also fighting the attorney general’s ban order in court.

    Disregarding the attorney general’s order could open DraftKings executives to criminal charges if a state court rules daily fantasy sports advanced illegal gambling in violation of state law.

    “It seems foolish to move forward and risk liability and jail time for executives simply to retain revenues for a short time,” said Edelman, who is a consultant to the daily fantasy sports industry and writes about it for Forbes. The professor pointed to the early 2000s case of WorldSportsExchange co-founder Jay Cohen, who went to prison for running an online gambling site, as proof of the dangers the daily fantasy sites risk in defying Schneiderman’s ban order.

    This fall, the multibillion dollar fantasy sports industry has faced increased scrutiny—including an FBI investigation for insider trading and a mention during a recent GOP presidential debate—as its advertisements promising millions of dollars in prizes have become almost as ubiquitous as the sports they revolve around. Complicating matters, American professional sports leagues, sports owners, and television networks broadcasting the contests have financial stakes in the industry.

    Schneiderman’s declaration last week that daily fantasy sports is a game of chance that can foster addiction among its participants places the industry’s largest market at risk. DraftKings and FanDuel participants in New York account for almost 13 percent of the industry as a whole, according to the New York Times.

    Schneiderman’s daily fantasy sports ban is being watched closely across the country, Edelman noted. Should New York succeed in banning these games under its illegal gambling statutes, other states might seek to do the same in their jurisdictions.

    Under such a scenario, daily fantasy sports in states like New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Nevada could conceivably fall under state oversight for licensing and tax revenue purposes.

    “It is certainly possible many within New York would like to tax and regulate daily fantasy sports, given the same course of action proposed in other states,” said Edelman, who is also Associate Professor of Law at Baruch’s Zicklin School of Business.

    FanDuel, which has its main office in Manhattan, and DraftKings can continue operating national business in New York, so long as it doesn’t include New Yorkers, Schneiderman said last week. The attorney general’s distinction likely means he feels the contests don’t violate gambling statutes in states like California and Massachusetts, Edelman reasoned. It also allows New York to continue collecting revenue from the sites’ operation here.

    DraftKings’ one tournament golf and one-race NASCAR contests—both of which FanDuel don’t offer—puts DraftKings at more legal risk, Edelman said. The reason, he explained, is because a state court could determine these contests have a material element of chance even if games involving other major American sports were deemed games of skill.

    –Ray Legendre

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

    Related Posts

    The Big Idea: Who Counts (and Who Doesn’t) in the U.S. Census 

    Helping Immigrant Families: Meet Christian Veliz ’28

    Fordham Law Alumna Melina Spadone ’95 Does It All

    Comments are closed.

    • The Big Idea
    August 5, 2025

    The Big Idea: Who Counts (and Who Doesn’t) in the U.S. Census 

    March 31, 2025

    The Big Idea: Local Politics, Reform Prosecutors, and Reshaping Mass Incarceration

    March 3, 2025

    The Big Idea: Forced Labor, Global Supply Chains, and Workers’ Rights

    November 6, 2024

    The Big Idea: Partisanship, Perception, and Prosecutorial Power

    READ MORE

    About

    Fordham University - The Jesuit University of New York

    Founded in 1841, Fordham is the Jesuit University of New York, offering exceptional education distinguished by the Jesuit tradition to more than 15,100 students in its four undergraduate colleges and its six graduate and professional schools.
    Connect With Fordham
    © 2025 ThemeSphere. Designed by ThemeSphere.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.