Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Return to Fordham Law School
    X (Twitter) Facebook LinkedIn Instagram RSS
    Fordham Law News
    • Home
    • Law School News
    • In the News
    • Fordham Lawyer
    • Insider
      • Announcements
      • Class Notes
      • In Memoriam
    • For the Media
      • Media Contacts
    • News by Topic
      • Business and Financial Law
      • Clinics
      • Intellectual Property and Information Law
      • International and Human Rights Law
      • Legal Ethics and Professional Practice
      • National Security
      • Public Interest and Service
    Return to Fordham Law School
    X (Twitter) Facebook LinkedIn Instagram RSS
    Fordham Law News
    You are at:Home»Awards»Moot Court Team Wins Regional Championship
    Amanda Meinhold, Kimberly Greer, Professor Maria L. Marcus, Emily Vance, and Andrea Chidyllo

    Moot Court Team Wins Regional Championship

    0
    By on December 1, 2015 Awards, Law School News, Litigation and Dispute Resolution, News, Student Organizations, Students

    The Fordham Moot Court team captured the regional championship and all the other prizes in the National Moot Court Competition, the country’s premier moot court event, on November 19.

    Team members included Amanda Meinhold, who served as captain, Kimberly R. Greer, who won Best Oralist, and Emily Anne Vance, who won Second Best Oralist. The Fordham team received the Best Brief award with a score of 97 out of 100. The team was coached by Andrea Chidyllo, Editor-in-Chief of the Moot Court Board, and Professor Maria L. Marcus.

    “The team’s professionalism was striking as they faced difficult, cutting-edge issues,” said Marcus. “At each stage, they continued researching and rethinking their arguments in order to perfect them.”

    In a competition that attracts hundreds of teams nationwide, the regional winners advance to the national championship rounds in February. The competition is sponsored by and held at the Association of the Bar of the City of New York.

    The issues involved 1) defining a tipper’s personal benefit and a tippee’s knowledge in insider trading cases and 2) whether exculpatory testimony given in a grand jury proceeding is admissible in a subsequent criminal trial if the witness is unavailable to testify.

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

    Related Posts

    Protecting Press Freedom: Meet Doris Zhang ’27

    Fordham Law’s Dispute Resolution Society Shines in Global Competitions 

    Navigating the Courtroom: Meet Oliver Vettoretti ’27

    Comments are closed.

    • The Big Idea
    March 31, 2025

    The Big Idea: Local Politics, Reform Prosecutors, and Reshaping Mass Incarceration

    March 3, 2025

    The Big Idea: Forced Labor, Global Supply Chains, and Workers’ Rights

    November 6, 2024

    The Big Idea: Partisanship, Perception, and Prosecutorial Power

    October 3, 2024

    The Big Idea: How a Franchising Model Can Transform Worker Cooperatives

    READ MORE

    About

    Fordham University - The Jesuit University of New York

    Founded in 1841, Fordham is the Jesuit University of New York, offering exceptional education distinguished by the Jesuit tradition to more than 15,100 students in its four undergraduate colleges and its six graduate and professional schools.
    Connect With Fordham
    © 2025 ThemeSphere. Designed by ThemeSphere.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.