Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Return to Fordham Law School
    X (Twitter) Facebook LinkedIn Instagram RSS
    Fordham Law News
    • Home
    • Law School News
    • In the News
    • Fordham Lawyer
    • Insider
      • Announcements
      • Class Notes
      • In Memoriam
    • For the Media
      • Media Contacts
    • News by Topic
      • Business and Financial Law
      • Clinics
      • Intellectual Property and Information Law
      • International and Human Rights Law
      • Legal Ethics and Professional Practice
      • National Security
      • Public Interest and Service
    Return to Fordham Law School
    X (Twitter) Facebook LinkedIn Instagram RSS
    Fordham Law News
    You are at:Home»Centers and Institutes»Karen Greenberg Talks Rogue Justice

    Karen Greenberg Talks Rogue Justice

    0
    By on June 3, 2016 Centers and Institutes, Editor's Picks, Law School News, National Security

    When Center on National Security Director Karen J. Greenberg started the project that would become her new book Rogue Justice: The Making of the Security State, she endeavored to explain why then Attorney General Eric Holder blamed Congress—not a broken court system—for his reluctant decision to prosecute Guantanamo prisoners in military commissions rather than in civilian courts. Tracing Holder’s actions back to the days after 9/11, Greenberg observed domestic terror suspects’ court proceedings, conducted hundreds of interviews, and sifted through thousands of pages of government documents, discovering “a worse story than I had known.

    In the 15 years since 9/11, a certain degree of implicit knowledge has existed that torture, domestic mass surveillance, drone strikes on foreign soil, and indefinite detention at Guantanamo Bay were “outside norms” of American law, Greenberg said during her book’s launch event at Fordham Law on June 1. Yet people in positions of power either closed their eyes to the realities around them or tried to effect change and then chose to keep their mouth shut after realizing they could not fix the situation.

    Once she observed the security state as a whole, Greenberg told the audience, she clearly saw moments when the abuses to the courts system and Constitution could have been stopped—a realization that made her “angrier” than when she first started.

    “We don’t realize what we’ve given up,” Greenberg said. “We’ve accepted compressions that were not worth accepting. We’re nowhere near reconstituting the free space we existed in and the expectation of justice we had.

    “As long as Guantanamo remains open there’s very little chance of us remembering who we are,” added Greenberg, whose previous book, The Least Worst Place: Guantanamo’s First 100 Days, was published in 2009.

    Nestor Davidson, associate dean for academic affairs at Fordham Law, introduced Greenberg as one of the Law School’s “leading lights,” praising her work leading the globally recognized Center on National Security and for engaging students and providing them valuable career advice.

    Greenberg spoke with David McCraw, assistant general counsel for the New York Times, who facilitated conversation on the import of the Ahmed Ghailani trial in New York, President Obama’s legacy on Guantanamo, and Greenberg’s response to a review in The Guardian that says Rogue Justice lacks heroes. She acknowledged that national security is a hot topic to broach because proponents of its two main arguments—national security versus citizens’ rights—publicly rebuke each other’s stance and rarely find common ground.

    For years after 9/11, American courts, with the exception of the Supreme Court, deferred to the president on matters of national security, Greenberg said, describing this pattern of behavior as antithetical to a “robust, protective court system.” This deference allowed, for instance, the NSA to spy on Americans’ telephone communications, one of the many revelations brought forth by Edward Snowden, who Greenberg labeled as one of Rogue Justice’s heroes. She later noted mentions in the press that the Obama administration could possibly strike a deal pardoning Snowden, a statement that drew audience applause.

    Greenberg also characterized President Obama as one of the book’s heroes for his behind-the-scenes actions commissioning a report on post-9/11 surveillance policies that led to reforms brought forth by the USA Freedom Act. However, she criticized the president on Guantanamo, stating that his support for indefinite detention several months into his presidency showed him at odds with his campaign promise of closing the detention camp. In the past, fear of political repercussions—not terrorism—made Guantanamo “intractable,” she said, but indicated that that ‘s beginning to change.

    The Obama administration has also fallen short of its goals to prosecute Guantanamo detainees in civilian court for crimes against America. The turning point came in November 2010, Greenberg noted, after a federal jury found Ghailani, a Tanzanian national, not guilty on all but one of 284 charges related to the 1998 attacks on U.S. embassies in east Africa that killed 224 people. He was acquitted on all murder charges.

    Though Ghailani received life in prison for conspiring to destroy government buildings and property, the Obama administration has not prosecuted another Guantanamo detainee since in federal court.

    “It’s the message the government got,” Greenberg explained. “Don’t go there. Don’t go into the courtroom.”

    Terrorism is not the greatest danger American society faces today, Greenberg said in response to a student’s question about the potential for martial law in the future. This opinion is in marked contrast from those of people who profit from the military industrial complex and want people to stay fearful.

    “Don’t be scared,” Greenberg said as a parting message to the audience.

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

    Related Posts

    Fighting for Military Justice: Meet Roxanne Roman ’26

    The Big Idea: Who Counts (and Who Doesn’t) in the U.S. Census 

    Helping Immigrant Families: Meet Christian Veliz ’28

    Comments are closed.

    • The Big Idea
    August 5, 2025

    The Big Idea: Who Counts (and Who Doesn’t) in the U.S. Census 

    March 31, 2025

    The Big Idea: Local Politics, Reform Prosecutors, and Reshaping Mass Incarceration

    March 3, 2025

    The Big Idea: Forced Labor, Global Supply Chains, and Workers’ Rights

    November 6, 2024

    The Big Idea: Partisanship, Perception, and Prosecutorial Power

    READ MORE

    About

    Fordham University - The Jesuit University of New York

    Founded in 1841, Fordham is the Jesuit University of New York, offering exceptional education distinguished by the Jesuit tradition to more than 15,100 students in its four undergraduate colleges and its six graduate and professional schools.
    Connect With Fordham
    © 2025 ThemeSphere. Designed by ThemeSphere.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.