Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Return to Fordham Law School
    X (Twitter) Facebook LinkedIn Instagram RSS
    Fordham Law News
    • Home
    • Law School News
    • In the News
    • Fordham Lawyer
    • Insider
      • Announcements
      • Class Notes
      • In Memoriam
    • For the Media
      • Media Contacts
    • News by Topic
      • Business and Financial Law
      • Clinics
      • Intellectual Property and Information Law
      • International and Human Rights Law
      • Legal Ethics and Professional Practice
      • National Security
      • Public Interest and Service
    Return to Fordham Law School
    X (Twitter) Facebook LinkedIn Instagram RSS
    Fordham Law News
    You are at:Home»Faculty»Fordham Law Professors React to Supreme Court Abortion Ruling

    Fordham Law Professors React to Supreme Court Abortion Ruling

    0
    By on June 27, 2016 Faculty, Law School News

    In a 5-3 vote, the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled today to strike down a Texas law regulating the state’s abortion clinics. The Court found that the law would have placed an “undue burden” on abortion access. Justice Stephen Breyer wrote the majority opinion.

    “This is a clear-cut win for supporters of reproductive health,” said Professor Clare Huntington. “The Supreme Court held that states must be much more careful when regulating providers of reproductive health services and that states cannot simply claim to be protecting women’s health. States must prove that they are doing so and that the benefits to women’s health outweigh the burden on the constitutionally protected right of a woman to choose whether to proceed with a pregnancy. The Supreme Court’s decision makes clear that courts will scrutinize claims by legislatures. The Supreme Court underscored the independent duty of courts to collect evidence and make factual determinations. The Court’s opinion is particularly attuned to the real world effects of the Texas regulations, describing at length the challenges posed by traveling long distances and the concerns about the health care available to women in ‘crammed-to-capacity’ clinics.”

    Professor Thomas Lee also offered commentary:

    “In Whole Women’s Health v. Hellerstedt, the Supreme Court, by a 5-3 vote, struck down Texas laws that required abortion clinics: (1) to have doctors with admitting privileges and (2) to meet the standards of ambulatory surgical centers. Justice Stephen Breyer wrote the opinion for the majority, in which Justice Kennedy joined; this is interesting, because Kennedy as senior justice could have taken the helm but passed it to Breyer. In a nutshell, the majority opinion puts some teeth back into the ‘undue burden’ analysis of Planned Parenthood v. Casey (co-authored by Kennedy with former Justices O’Connor and Souter 1992), which had been chipped away both by the Court and the lower courts in the past couple decades. The Hellerstedt majority resurrected the district court’s findings (since supplemented by amicus curiae briefs) that the two restrictions substantially burden the rights of women of reproductive age, particularly in west Texas. The Supreme Court’s ruling is a fairly strong rebuke of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals which overturned the district court’s invalidation of the Texas laws, and I expect there will be a lot of ‘grants, vacates, and remands’ to lawsuits against similar restrictions in other states. And it’s interesting that the Court decided that there would be an undue burden without smoking-gun evidence of actual effects but to a large part based on the credibility of predictions of dramatically diminished access to abortion. The consequence is that there will still be a lot of follow-on litigation about whether some watered-down version of each of type of restriction can stand.”

    Media requests for these professors may be directed to Peter Pochna, 212-843-8007, or Eileen Sullivan, 212-843-8016.

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

    Related Posts

    Fighting for Military Justice: Meet Roxanne Roman ’26

    The Big Idea: Who Counts (and Who Doesn’t) in the U.S. Census 

    Helping Immigrant Families: Meet Christian Veliz ’28

    Comments are closed.

    • The Big Idea
    August 5, 2025

    The Big Idea: Who Counts (and Who Doesn’t) in the U.S. Census 

    March 31, 2025

    The Big Idea: Local Politics, Reform Prosecutors, and Reshaping Mass Incarceration

    March 3, 2025

    The Big Idea: Forced Labor, Global Supply Chains, and Workers’ Rights

    November 6, 2024

    The Big Idea: Partisanship, Perception, and Prosecutorial Power

    READ MORE

    About

    Fordham University - The Jesuit University of New York

    Founded in 1841, Fordham is the Jesuit University of New York, offering exceptional education distinguished by the Jesuit tradition to more than 15,100 students in its four undergraduate colleges and its six graduate and professional schools.
    Connect With Fordham
    © 2025 ThemeSphere. Designed by ThemeSphere.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.