Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Return to Fordham Law School
    X (Twitter) Facebook LinkedIn Instagram RSS
    Fordham Law News
    • Home
    • Law School News
    • In the News
    • Fordham Lawyer
    • Insider
      • Announcements
      • Class Notes
      • In Memoriam
    • For the Media
      • Media Contacts
    • News by Topic
      • Business and Financial Law
      • Clinics
      • Intellectual Property and Information Law
      • International and Human Rights Law
      • Legal Ethics and Professional Practice
      • National Security
      • Public Interest and Service
    Return to Fordham Law School
    X (Twitter) Facebook LinkedIn Instagram RSS
    Fordham Law News
    You are at:Home»Faculty»Attorneys React to High Court’s Political Bribery Ruling

    Attorneys React to High Court’s Political Bribery Ruling

    0
    By on June 27, 2016 Faculty, In the News

    Thomas Lee was quoted in a Law360 article about the Supreme Court’s decision in McDonnell v. United States.

    Thomas H. Lee, Fordham Law School
    “The Supreme Court, in a unanimous opinion by Chief Justice [John] Roberts, vacated the corruption conviction of former Gov. McDonnell. The court’s basic point was that the trial court had wrongly refused to instruct the jury that McDonnell had to have committed — or agreed to commit — an ‘official act’ for a loan or gift, and things like making phone calls or setting up get-to-know-you lunches or meetings with other state officials to help the gift-giver aren’t ‘official acts’ as defined by the statute. The federal prosecutors will have to decide whether to reattempt a prosecution with the narrower definition of ‘official act.’ My guess is that they will not, because the way that Roberts’ opinion goes over the facts suggests McDonnell and his staff was very cagey about not actually delivering a quid pro quo. In bigger, societal terms, the decision reflects the influence of bipartisan arguments made by a number of high-level Democratic and Republican government officials that prosecutions of this sort would severely impact the political process. It also reaffirms the unchallenged primacy of the narrow ‘quid pro quo’ definition of corruption as a legal concept in the criminal prosecution context, despite its controversiality in the campaign contribution context after Citizens United.”

    Read the full article.

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

    Related Posts

    The Big Idea: Who Counts (and Who Doesn’t) in the U.S. Census 

    Bloomberg Law: Prof. Bruce Green on Whether Judges Can Face Sanctions for the Kind of Errors They Find in Lawyers’ Work

    The New York Times: Prof. Bruce Green on Conflict of Interest in Epstein Scandal

    Comments are closed.

    • The Big Idea
    August 5, 2025

    The Big Idea: Who Counts (and Who Doesn’t) in the U.S. Census 

    March 31, 2025

    The Big Idea: Local Politics, Reform Prosecutors, and Reshaping Mass Incarceration

    March 3, 2025

    The Big Idea: Forced Labor, Global Supply Chains, and Workers’ Rights

    November 6, 2024

    The Big Idea: Partisanship, Perception, and Prosecutorial Power

    READ MORE

    About

    Fordham University - The Jesuit University of New York

    Founded in 1841, Fordham is the Jesuit University of New York, offering exceptional education distinguished by the Jesuit tradition to more than 15,100 students in its four undergraduate colleges and its six graduate and professional schools.
    Connect With Fordham
    © 2025 ThemeSphere. Designed by ThemeSphere.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.