Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Return to Fordham Law School
    X (Twitter) Facebook LinkedIn Instagram RSS
    Fordham Law News
    • Home
    • Law School News
    • In the News
    • Fordham Lawyer
    • Insider
      • Announcements
      • Class Notes
      • In Memoriam
    • For the Media
      • Media Contacts
    • News by Topic
      • Business and Financial Law
      • Clinics
      • Intellectual Property and Information Law
      • International and Human Rights Law
      • Legal Ethics and Professional Practice
      • National Security
      • Public Interest and Service
    Return to Fordham Law School
    X (Twitter) Facebook LinkedIn Instagram RSS
    Fordham Law News
    You are at:Home»In the News»Chevron Wins in $9.8 Billion Case

    Chevron Wins in $9.8 Billion Case

    0
    By on August 9, 2016 Faculty, In the News

    Fordham Law Professor Howard Erichson spoke with Bloomberg Law about Chevron’s recent victory in a long-running court battle over toxic waste spilled in the Amazon Rain Forest of Ecuador.

    In 2011, an Ecuadorian court ruled that Chevron was responsible for the oil pollution; however, Chevron refused to pay the $8.6 billion judgment and took the case back to New York.

    On Monday, the U.S. Court of Appeals in New York ruled that the judgment won by lawyer Steven Donziger was obtained by means of bribery, coercion, and fraud. Monday’s decision is thought to be unprecedented in American law, as this case is the first in which a U.S. court allowed someone who lost a case in another country to come to the U.S. to attack a foreign court’s damages award.

    Erichson, along with Paul Barrett, a Bloomberg Businessweek editor and author of Law of the Jungle, spoke about Monday’s ruling with Bloomberg Law host June Grasso on Bloomberg Radio’s “Bloomberg Law.”

    “I certainly don’t know of another case like this one, but there are so many things about this case that seem unprecedented. The basic idea is well established that courts don’t want to enforce a judgment, if the judgment was obtained by fraud or corruption or bribery.

    “It’s a big deal to take a multi-billion dollar judgment entered by a foreign court and then declare that the U.S. courts are unwilling to enforce that judgment.”

    …

    “The second circuit—U.S. court of appeals—really deferred to Judge [Lewis] Kaplan, the trial judge’s factual findings and that’s what appellate courts are supposed to do. They did not hear the evidence, they deferred to the trial judge on those factual findings and then they applied the law.”

    Listen to the full radio segment.

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

    Related Posts

    Dan’s Papers: Prof. Jerry Goldfeder on How Lawyers are Becoming Bigger Players in Elections

    Dan’s Papers: Prof. Jerry Goldfeder on Voters Being Urged to Change Registration to Vote in Mayoral Election

    Above the Law: Prof. Thomas Lee on the Validity of Justice Department’s Misconduct Complaint Against U.S. District Court Chief Judge

    Comments are closed.

    • The Big Idea
    August 5, 2025

    The Big Idea: Who Counts (and Who Doesn’t) in the U.S. Census 

    March 31, 2025

    The Big Idea: Local Politics, Reform Prosecutors, and Reshaping Mass Incarceration

    March 3, 2025

    The Big Idea: Forced Labor, Global Supply Chains, and Workers’ Rights

    November 6, 2024

    The Big Idea: Partisanship, Perception, and Prosecutorial Power

    READ MORE

    About

    Fordham University - The Jesuit University of New York

    Founded in 1841, Fordham is the Jesuit University of New York, offering exceptional education distinguished by the Jesuit tradition to more than 15,100 students in its four undergraduate colleges and its six graduate and professional schools.
    Connect With Fordham
    © 2025 ThemeSphere. Designed by ThemeSphere.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.