Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Return to Fordham Law School
    X (Twitter) Facebook LinkedIn Instagram RSS
    Fordham Law News
    • Home
    • Law School News
    • In the News
    • Fordham Lawyer
    • Insider
      • Announcements
      • Class Notes
      • In Memoriam
    • For the Media
      • Media Contacts
    • News by Topic
      • Business and Financial Law
      • Clinics
      • Intellectual Property and Information Law
      • International and Human Rights Law
      • Legal Ethics and Professional Practice
      • National Security
      • Public Interest and Service
    Return to Fordham Law School
    X (Twitter) Facebook LinkedIn Instagram RSS
    Fordham Law News
    You are at:Home»Law School News»With Drug Shortage, Rush to Execute

    With Drug Shortage, Rush to Execute

    0
    By on March 13, 2017 Deborah Denno, Editor's Picks, Law School News

    The state of Arkansas recently unveiled plans to put to death eight men over 10 days in April; this planned spate of executions is, rather than a testament to the Constitution or a sense of justice, a “shocking” example of lethal injection drug shortages ultimately determining the fate of inmates, said Fordham Law Professor Deborah W. Denno, a leading death penalty expert, during an interview this week.

    Arkansas’ supply of midazolam, a sedative used in the state’s three-drug lethal injection cocktail, will expire at the end of April, prompting the state to push forward with its first executions in 12 years, at a rate unprecedented nationally in the modern era. Midazolam has been linked to several botched executions in recent years, and the volume of executions in a brief window of time—plus the state’s lack of recent executions—raises serious concerns about potential botches, Denno said.

    Arkansas Governor Asa Hutchinson acknowledged earlier this month that he would have preferred to have “multiple months and years” to carry out the executions, but stated “that’s not the circumstances that I find myself in.” Denno called Hutchinson’s statement “an abysmal, embarrassing excuse” that sought to abdicate responsibility for the executions.

    “Hutchinson’s statement just points to all the problems with lethal injection in this country,” Denno said. “It’s safe to assume all these men would live longer if a drug shortage weren’t an issue. Their lives are being dictated by a drug shortage.”

    “Executions shouldn’t be fueled by this kind of external constraint,” the professor added. “They’re supposed to have a purpose outside of that.”

    Arkansas is scheduled to execute two men apiece on four separate days between April 17–27. While Hutchinson conceded this was less than ideal, he defended the state’s plans by raising the need for closure among victims’ families. Each of the Arkansas inmates scheduled for execution next month arrived on death row no later than 1999.

    At the root of Hutchinson’s urgency is the realization that each year the men remain on death row the harder it will be to execute them, Denno explained. Arkansas’ lack of executions since 2005 is part of a nationwide trend. The United States’ 20 executions last year were its fewest since capital punishment was reinstituted in the late 1970s.

    “Every year that someone remains unexecuted heightens the potential they won’t be executed because the country’s support of the death penalty is on the downswing,” Denno said. In addition, lethal injection drugs are increasingly scarce, as the current predicament in Arkansas underlines.

    Hutchinson’s haste comes with potential hazards, such as the violation of the Cruel and Unusual Punishment Clause in the Eighth Amendment.

    Denno highlighted the botched execution of Oklahoma death row inmate Clayton Lockett as an example of the potential dangers of scheduling multiple executions in one day, let alone eight in 10 days. Lockett groaned and writhed on the table before dying 43 minutes after the first execution drug was administered, according to eyewitness reports.

    Lockett’s death underscores the dangers associated with rushing one execution to make time for the second as well as the potential that one inmate could receive fewer drugs than another.

    “Multiply that scenario by four,” Denno said. “It’s just inviting problems in a country where there are multiple problems with the death penalty under the best of circumstances.”

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

    Related Posts

    Helping Immigrant Families: Meet Christian Veliz ’28

    Fordham Law Alumna Melina Spadone ’95 Does It All

    Protecting Press Freedom: Meet Doris Zhang ’27

    Comments are closed.

    • The Big Idea
    March 31, 2025

    The Big Idea: Local Politics, Reform Prosecutors, and Reshaping Mass Incarceration

    March 3, 2025

    The Big Idea: Forced Labor, Global Supply Chains, and Workers’ Rights

    November 6, 2024

    The Big Idea: Partisanship, Perception, and Prosecutorial Power

    October 3, 2024

    The Big Idea: How a Franchising Model Can Transform Worker Cooperatives

    READ MORE

    About

    Fordham University - The Jesuit University of New York

    Founded in 1841, Fordham is the Jesuit University of New York, offering exceptional education distinguished by the Jesuit tradition to more than 15,100 students in its four undergraduate colleges and its six graduate and professional schools.
    Connect With Fordham
    © 2025 ThemeSphere. Designed by ThemeSphere.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.