Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Return to Fordham Law School
    X (Twitter) Facebook LinkedIn Instagram RSS
    Fordham Law News
    • Home
    • Law School News
    • In the News
    • Fordham Lawyer
    • Insider
      • Announcements
      • Class Notes
      • In Memoriam
    • For the Media
      • Media Contacts
    • News by Topic
      • Business and Financial Law
      • Clinics
      • Intellectual Property and Information Law
      • International and Human Rights Law
      • Legal Ethics and Professional Practice
      • National Security
      • Public Interest and Service
    Return to Fordham Law School
    X (Twitter) Facebook LinkedIn Instagram RSS
    Fordham Law News
    You are at:Home»Faculty»‘The Form of the Question’: A Must-Read for Litigators

    ‘The Form of the Question’: A Must-Read for Litigators

    0
    By Newsroom on December 1, 2017 Faculty, In the News

    Professor Dan Capra and Adjunct Professor Ethan Greenberg authored a book, ‘The Form of the Question’ whose review has been posted by the New York Law Journal.

    Once you read ‘The Form of the Question’, your eyes will be opened to the many possible objections you may have missed in the past, or failed to preserve for appeal.

    …

    Have you ever found yourself in a situation where your witness is being cross-examined and the questioner asks what you believe is an objectionable question? You rise to object and the judge asks, “What are the grounds for your objection?’” You stutter and withdraw your objection. Once you read “The Form of the Question,” you should never face that problem again; your eyes will be opened to the many possible objections you may have missed in the past, or failed to preserve for appeal. Whether an experienced litigator or a novice, “The Form of the Question” will help you hone your cross-examination skills.

    This book guides you through the rule against leading questions, explaining the major exceptions to the rule. Other topics covered include the objections: asked and answered, calling for a narrative, argumentative, badgering, compound questions, badgering a witness, assuming a fact not in evidence, vague, beyond the scope, and motions to strike.

    The book explains each rule, sets forth relevant case law, and provides actual trial transcripts which are dissected for the reader. It includes exercises that enable to reader to best develop or enhance their cross-examination skills.

    Read the full review.

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

    Related Posts

    The Big Idea: Who Counts (and Who Doesn’t) in the U.S. Census 

    Bloomberg Law: Prof. Bruce Green on Whether Judges Can Face Sanctions for the Kind of Errors They Find in Lawyers’ Work

    The New York Times: Prof. Bruce Green on Conflict of Interest in Epstein Scandal

    Comments are closed.

    • The Big Idea
    August 5, 2025

    The Big Idea: Who Counts (and Who Doesn’t) in the U.S. Census 

    March 31, 2025

    The Big Idea: Local Politics, Reform Prosecutors, and Reshaping Mass Incarceration

    March 3, 2025

    The Big Idea: Forced Labor, Global Supply Chains, and Workers’ Rights

    November 6, 2024

    The Big Idea: Partisanship, Perception, and Prosecutorial Power

    READ MORE

    About

    Fordham University - The Jesuit University of New York

    Founded in 1841, Fordham is the Jesuit University of New York, offering exceptional education distinguished by the Jesuit tradition to more than 15,100 students in its four undergraduate colleges and its six graduate and professional schools.
    Connect With Fordham
    © 2025 ThemeSphere. Designed by ThemeSphere.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.