Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Return to Fordham Law School
    X (Twitter) Facebook LinkedIn Instagram RSS
    Fordham Law News
    • Home
    • Law School News
    • In the News
    • Fordham Lawyer
    • Insider
      • Announcements
      • Class Notes
      • In Memoriam
    • For the Media
      • Media Contacts
    • News by Topic
      • Business and Financial Law
      • Clinics
      • Intellectual Property and Information Law
      • International and Human Rights Law
      • Legal Ethics and Professional Practice
      • National Security
      • Public Interest and Service
    Return to Fordham Law School
    X (Twitter) Facebook LinkedIn Instagram RSS
    Fordham Law News
    You are at:Home»Faculty»Mayor’s Marijuana Policy Is Illegal, Unconstitutional And Irrational

    Mayor’s Marijuana Policy Is Illegal, Unconstitutional And Irrational

    0
    By dduttachakraborty on July 10, 2018 Faculty, In the News

    Clinic Professor Martha Rayner wrote an op-ed in Crains New York about Mayor DeBlasio’s stance in marijuana and drug enforcement laws.

    The Police Department’s recent announcement that it will no longer arrest people for publicly smoking marijuana is welcome news, but carving out an exception for those with arrest histories violates the constitution, state statutes and is just plain bad policy.

     

    Over half of all arrests will not result in convictions of any kind, yet this troubling practice is embedded in other areas of policing to the detriment of New Yorkers, most notably in the NYPD’s so-called “transit recidivist” policy that singles out subway riders with prior arrests for harsher treatment when they commit transit violations.

    …

    This sudden and significant escalation of police power and intrusion on subway passengers’ privacy cannot be justified under the Fourth Amendment’s prohibition against unreasonable search and seizure.

    …

    The transit and marijuana policies are also unconstitutional because they subject people with past arrests to highly intrusive body searches without legal justification. There is no reason to search a subway rider stopped for breaking the MTA rule prohibiting liquid in open containers—like coffee. So what reason is there to search the same passenger upon learning of a past arrest?

    …

    The policy also breaks the law because most of the past arrests that trigger the new arrests have already been dismissed, yet remain in police databases in violation of state sealing statutes. Designed to protect New Yorkers from the negative consequences of arrests that do not result in criminal convictions, the law requires the police to seal all information in connection with an arrest that results in a dismissal or noncriminal conviction.

     

    Read full op-ed.

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

    Related Posts

    The Big Idea: Who Counts (and Who Doesn’t) in the U.S. Census 

    Bloomberg Law: Prof. Bruce Green on Whether Judges Can Face Sanctions for the Kind of Errors They Find in Lawyers’ Work

    The New York Times: Prof. Bruce Green on Conflict of Interest in Epstein Scandal

    Comments are closed.

    • The Big Idea
    August 5, 2025

    The Big Idea: Who Counts (and Who Doesn’t) in the U.S. Census 

    March 31, 2025

    The Big Idea: Local Politics, Reform Prosecutors, and Reshaping Mass Incarceration

    March 3, 2025

    The Big Idea: Forced Labor, Global Supply Chains, and Workers’ Rights

    November 6, 2024

    The Big Idea: Partisanship, Perception, and Prosecutorial Power

    READ MORE

    About

    Fordham University - The Jesuit University of New York

    Founded in 1841, Fordham is the Jesuit University of New York, offering exceptional education distinguished by the Jesuit tradition to more than 15,100 students in its four undergraduate colleges and its six graduate and professional schools.
    Connect With Fordham
    © 2025 ThemeSphere. Designed by ThemeSphere.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.