Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Return to Fordham Law School
    X (Twitter) Facebook LinkedIn Instagram RSS
    Fordham Law News
    • Home
    • Law School News
    • In the News
    • Fordham Lawyer
    • Insider
      • Announcements
      • Class Notes
      • In Memoriam
    • For the Media
      • Media Contacts
    • News by Topic
      • Business and Financial Law
      • Clinics
      • Intellectual Property and Information Law
      • International and Human Rights Law
      • Legal Ethics and Professional Practice
      • National Security
      • Public Interest and Service
    Return to Fordham Law School
    X (Twitter) Facebook LinkedIn Instagram RSS
    Fordham Law News
    You are at:Home»Faculty»National Popular Vote, With All Its Flaws, Is Worth Serious Look

    National Popular Vote, With All Its Flaws, Is Worth Serious Look

    0
    By bwieboldt on January 7, 2019 Faculty, In the News

    Adjunct Professor Jerry H. Goldfeder wrote a letter to the editor of the New York Law Journal in response to a lawyer’s analysis of the National Popular Vote.

    I was delighted to read William Josephson’s comprehensive analysis of the National Popular Vote (NYLJ, Jan. 7) in response to my suggestion that the New York bar take up its cause (NYLJ, Dec. 17). While I may not agree with all of his points, readers should be aware that Mr. Josephson is an expert in the history and implementation of the electoral college system.

    His fundamental disagreement in supporting the NPV involves a point on which he is absolutely correct: that when electors act “on their own”—consistent with the constitution’s original intent—the United States Congress counts their votes, even when state law purportedly forbids it. Therefore, a state that embraces NPV may not be able to control its electors any more than a state can now.

    All of this is to say that there are of course legal and policy issues confronting those who wish to abolish or reform the anti-democratic Electoral College. The NPV, with all of its flaws, is worth a serious look.

    Read the full letter to the editor.

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

    Related Posts

    Bloomberg Law: Prof. Bruce Green on Whether Judges Can Face Sanctions for the Kind of Errors They Find in Lawyers’ Work

    The New York Times: Prof. Bruce Green on Conflict of Interest in Epstein Scandal

    NBC New York: Prof. Martin S. Flaherty Provides Legal Opinion on Whether President Can Take Over New York City

    Comments are closed.

    • The Big Idea
    March 31, 2025

    The Big Idea: Local Politics, Reform Prosecutors, and Reshaping Mass Incarceration

    March 3, 2025

    The Big Idea: Forced Labor, Global Supply Chains, and Workers’ Rights

    November 6, 2024

    The Big Idea: Partisanship, Perception, and Prosecutorial Power

    October 3, 2024

    The Big Idea: How a Franchising Model Can Transform Worker Cooperatives

    READ MORE

    About

    Fordham University - The Jesuit University of New York

    Founded in 1841, Fordham is the Jesuit University of New York, offering exceptional education distinguished by the Jesuit tradition to more than 15,100 students in its four undergraduate colleges and its six graduate and professional schools.
    Connect With Fordham
    © 2025 ThemeSphere. Designed by ThemeSphere.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.