Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Return to Fordham Law School
    X (Twitter) Facebook LinkedIn Instagram RSS
    Fordham Law News
    • Home
    • Law School News
    • In the News
    • Fordham Lawyer
    • Insider
      • Announcements
      • Class Notes
      • In Memoriam
    • For the Media
      • Media Contacts
    • News by Topic
      • Business and Financial Law
      • Clinics
      • Intellectual Property and Information Law
      • International and Human Rights Law
      • Legal Ethics and Professional Practice
      • National Security
      • Public Interest and Service
    Return to Fordham Law School
    X (Twitter) Facebook LinkedIn Instagram RSS
    Fordham Law News
    You are at:Home»Faculty»Barr ‘Wrong’ That Mueller Outcome Should’ve Meant No Probe

    Barr ‘Wrong’ That Mueller Outcome Should’ve Meant No Probe

    0
    By Newsroom on May 3, 2019 Faculty, In the News

    Professor Bruce Green was quoted in a Law360 article regarding U.S. Attorney General William Barr’s recent comments in which he indicated that special counsel Robert Mueller should have never investigated if he didn’t intend to make a prosecutive decision.

    “I think that if he felt that he shouldn’t go down the path of making a traditional prosecutive decision, then he shouldn’t have investigated. That was the time to pull up,” Barr said.

    Former Colorado U.S. Attorney John Walsh, now a Democratic candidate for Senate, said Barr was incorrect in saying the investigation should have finished before it started.

    “Attorney General Barr simply got it wrong in suggesting that the inability to bring charges or come to an ultimate conclusion meant that the Special Counsel’s Office should not have investigated at all,” Walsh said.
    …
    Attorneys said Wednesday that Barr’s testimony criticizing Mueller raises several questions.

    Fordham University legal ethics professor Bruce Green said that if it were truly an issue for Mueller to continue investigating given the legal quandary created by the DOJ Office of Legal Counsel’s opinion preventing Trump’s indictment, Rosenstein, who was supervising the probe, could have flagged that at any time.

    “It seems a little odd at this point for the attorney general to say Mueller never should’ve followed the evidence because he knew he was going to defer to Justice Department policy,” Green said.

    Read full article.

     

     

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

    Related Posts

    Fordham Law Scholarship Established in Memory of Rev. Dr. Romaine L. Gardner, Esq.

    The New York Times: Prof. Jerry Goldfeder on Implications of Candidate Remaining on Ballot in NYC Mayoral Race Despite Dropping Out

    Nature: Prof. Adam Orford Comments on Future of Controversial U.S. Climate Panel’s Draft Report

    Comments are closed.

    • The Big Idea
    September 8, 2025

    The Big Idea: All Lawyers Should Be Climate-Informed Lawyers

    August 5, 2025

    The Big Idea: Who Counts (and Who Doesn’t) in the U.S. Census 

    March 31, 2025

    The Big Idea: Local Politics, Reform Prosecutors, and Reshaping Mass Incarceration

    March 3, 2025

    The Big Idea: Forced Labor, Global Supply Chains, and Workers’ Rights

    READ MORE

    About

    Fordham University - The Jesuit University of New York

    Founded in 1841, Fordham is the Jesuit University of New York, offering exceptional education distinguished by the Jesuit tradition to more than 15,100 students in its four undergraduate colleges and its six graduate and professional schools.
    Connect With Fordham
    © 2025 ThemeSphere. Designed by ThemeSphere.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.