Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Return to Fordham Law School
    X (Twitter) Facebook LinkedIn Instagram RSS
    Fordham Law News
    • Home
    • Law School News
    • In the News
    • Fordham Lawyer
    • Insider
      • Announcements
      • Class Notes
      • In Memoriam
    • For the Media
      • Media Contacts
    • News by Topic
      • Business and Financial Law
      • Clinics
      • Intellectual Property and Information Law
      • International and Human Rights Law
      • Legal Ethics and Professional Practice
      • National Security
      • Public Interest and Service
    Return to Fordham Law School
    X (Twitter) Facebook LinkedIn Instagram RSS
    Fordham Law News
    You are at:Home»Faculty»Opioid Defendants Seek to Disqualify Judge Overseeing 2,300 Cases

    Opioid Defendants Seek to Disqualify Judge Overseeing 2,300 Cases

    0
    By Newsroom on September 16, 2019 Faculty, In the News

    Professor Howard Erichson provided his legal opinion to the New York Times on the motion filed by pharmacy retailers and drug distributors to disqualify the judge presiding over the bellwether Ohio case and nearly 2,300 other opioid-related lawsuits.

    Legal experts said they were surprised at the timing of the move to disqualify the judge, as well as what they called the extraordinary nature of the request. Although there is precedent for the recusal of federal judges, rarely are such motions granted so late in the process.

    Howard Erichson, a Fordham law professor who is an expert on complex litigation and legal ethics, noted that the request came after a recent flurry of pretrial decisions against the defendants by Judge Polster.

    “If recent rulings had been going the defendants’ way, they wouldn’t be seeking to get rid of the judge, despite his remarks to the press,” Mr. Erichson said.
    …
    Mr. Erichson thinks the effort has only a slight chance of working, not least because the question first goes to Judge Polster for a decision.

    Given the likelihood that the effort will fail, Mr. Erichson said, the strategy behind the 11th-hour gambit heading could be to push Judge Polster to rule more favorably for defendants during the trial, by making him feel exposed to scrutiny.

    But the move is very risky, he added, because it could merely manage to irritate the judge.

    Read full article.

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

    Related Posts

    Professor Catherine Powell Selected for Prestigious Princeton Fellowship

    Bloomberg Law: Prof. Bruce Green Says Rules of Professional Conduct Will Be Tested as KPMG Law Eyes National Reach

    Dan’s Papers: Prof. Jerry Goldfeder Quizzes Readers on New York Politics

    Comments are closed.

    • The Big Idea
    August 5, 2025

    The Big Idea: Who Counts (and Who Doesn’t) in the U.S. Census 

    March 31, 2025

    The Big Idea: Local Politics, Reform Prosecutors, and Reshaping Mass Incarceration

    March 3, 2025

    The Big Idea: Forced Labor, Global Supply Chains, and Workers’ Rights

    November 6, 2024

    The Big Idea: Partisanship, Perception, and Prosecutorial Power

    READ MORE

    About

    Fordham University - The Jesuit University of New York

    Founded in 1841, Fordham is the Jesuit University of New York, offering exceptional education distinguished by the Jesuit tradition to more than 15,100 students in its four undergraduate colleges and its six graduate and professional schools.
    Connect With Fordham
    © 2025 ThemeSphere. Designed by ThemeSphere.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.