Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Return to Fordham Law School
    X (Twitter) Facebook LinkedIn Instagram RSS
    Fordham Law News
    • Home
    • Law School News
    • In the News
    • Fordham Lawyer
    • Insider
      • Announcements
      • Class Notes
      • In Memoriam
    • For the Media
      • Media Contacts
    • News by Topic
      • Business and Financial Law
      • Clinics
      • Intellectual Property and Information Law
      • International and Human Rights Law
      • Legal Ethics and Professional Practice
      • National Security
      • Public Interest and Service
    Return to Fordham Law School
    X (Twitter) Facebook LinkedIn Instagram RSS
    Fordham Law News
    You are at:Home»Faculty»Companies Shifted Deductions, Income to Maximize 2017 U.S. Tax-Rate Cut
    Rebecca Kysar

    Companies Shifted Deductions, Income to Maximize 2017 U.S. Tax-Rate Cut

    0
    By on February 12, 2020 Faculty, In the News

    Professor Rebecca Kysar‘s expert opinion on corporate tax rates was quoted in the Wall Street Journal. Kysar testified on Tuesday in front of the Ways & Means Committee, in Washington, D.C., during the “Disappearing Corporate Income Tax” hearing.

    U.S. corporations accelerated deductions and deferred income to maximize the benefits of the 2017 tax-rate cut, contributing to a large temporary drop in federal corporate-tax revenue in 2018, according to newly released data.

    …

    Nevertheless, as the rate cut was happening, the incentives were clear for companies. They wanted to take as many deductions as possible in 2017 and push as much income into 2018 as possible. Those actions would reduce the share of a company’s taxable income subject to the 35% rate in 2017 and increase the share subject to the 21% rate in 2018.

    The reverse could be true if Democrats win the White House in November and follow through on their campaign promises to raise tax rates. Companies would then have an incentive to accelerate income and defer deductions.

    One way to prevent these maneuvers would be to phase in tax cuts gradually, said Rebecca Kysar, a Fordham University law professor who testified at a House Ways and Means Committee hearing on Tuesday. In 2017, Republicans debated and then rejected that option.

    Read the full article.

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

    Related Posts

    Dan’s Papers: Prof. Jerry Goldfeder on How Lawyers are Becoming Bigger Players in Elections

    Dan’s Papers: Prof. Jerry Goldfeder on Voters Being Urged to Change Registration to Vote in Mayoral Election

    Above the Law: Prof. Thomas Lee on the Validity of Justice Department’s Misconduct Complaint Against U.S. District Court Chief Judge

    Comments are closed.

    • The Big Idea
    August 5, 2025

    The Big Idea: Who Counts (and Who Doesn’t) in the U.S. Census 

    March 31, 2025

    The Big Idea: Local Politics, Reform Prosecutors, and Reshaping Mass Incarceration

    March 3, 2025

    The Big Idea: Forced Labor, Global Supply Chains, and Workers’ Rights

    November 6, 2024

    The Big Idea: Partisanship, Perception, and Prosecutorial Power

    READ MORE

    About

    Fordham University - The Jesuit University of New York

    Founded in 1841, Fordham is the Jesuit University of New York, offering exceptional education distinguished by the Jesuit tradition to more than 15,100 students in its four undergraduate colleges and its six graduate and professional schools.
    Connect With Fordham
    © 2025 ThemeSphere. Designed by ThemeSphere.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.