Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Return to Fordham Law School
    X (Twitter) Facebook LinkedIn Instagram RSS
    Fordham Law News
    • Home
    • Law School News
    • In the News
    • Fordham Lawyer
    • Insider
      • Announcements
      • Class Notes
      • In Memoriam
    • For the Media
      • Media Contacts
    • News by Topic
      • Business and Financial Law
      • Clinics
      • Intellectual Property and Information Law
      • International and Human Rights Law
      • Legal Ethics and Professional Practice
      • National Security
      • Public Interest and Service
    Return to Fordham Law School
    X (Twitter) Facebook LinkedIn Instagram RSS
    Fordham Law News
    You are at:Home»Faculty»Proposal to Alter Duty of Client Confidentiality Has Lawyers Divided on the Merits

    Proposal to Alter Duty of Client Confidentiality Has Lawyers Divided on the Merits

    0
    By on June 23, 2020 Faculty, In the News

    Professor Bruce Green was quoted in a New Jersey Law Journal article on the proposal to alter laws surrounding client confidentiality, specifically when it could affect someone that was wrongfully convicted.

    Lawyers are divided over a proposed rule change that would require them to disclose information about wrongful incarceration of an innocent person.

    A Supreme Court committee proposed on May 26 that the court should amend RPC 1.6 to provide an exception to a lawyer’s duty to maintain confidentiality of information relating to representation of a client when that information relates to a wrongful conviction.

    …

    New Jersey’s proposed revision is similar to rule changes adopted in Alaska and Massachusetts, although those states made disclosure optional, Green said. He said there was no evidence that the policy had any impact on attorney-client relationships in those states.

    Green said he supports a narrow exception to RPC 1.6 allowing lawyers to disclose information that would help exonerate wrongfully incarcerated people after the person making the disclosure has died. “That’s less likely to chill candid disclosure. I kind of understand all the concern on the other side. It’s not always clear that disclosing the information is going to make a difference, which suggests at most it ought to be discretionary.”

    Read the full article.

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

    Related Posts

    Professor Catherine Powell Selected for Prestigious Princeton Fellowship

    Bloomberg Law: Prof. Bruce Green Says Rules of Professional Conduct Will Be Tested as KPMG Law Eyes National Reach

    Dan’s Papers: Prof. Jerry Goldfeder Quizzes Readers on New York Politics

    Comments are closed.

    • The Big Idea
    August 5, 2025

    The Big Idea: Who Counts (and Who Doesn’t) in the U.S. Census 

    March 31, 2025

    The Big Idea: Local Politics, Reform Prosecutors, and Reshaping Mass Incarceration

    March 3, 2025

    The Big Idea: Forced Labor, Global Supply Chains, and Workers’ Rights

    November 6, 2024

    The Big Idea: Partisanship, Perception, and Prosecutorial Power

    READ MORE

    About

    Fordham University - The Jesuit University of New York

    Founded in 1841, Fordham is the Jesuit University of New York, offering exceptional education distinguished by the Jesuit tradition to more than 15,100 students in its four undergraduate colleges and its six graduate and professional schools.
    Connect With Fordham
    © 2025 ThemeSphere. Designed by ThemeSphere.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.