Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Return to Fordham Law School
    X (Twitter) Facebook LinkedIn Instagram RSS
    Fordham Law News
    • Home
    • Law School News
    • In the News
    • Fordham Lawyer
    • Insider
      • Announcements
      • Class Notes
      • In Memoriam
    • For the Media
      • Media Contacts
    • News by Topic
      • Business and Financial Law
      • Clinics
      • Intellectual Property and Information Law
      • International and Human Rights Law
      • Legal Ethics and Professional Practice
      • National Security
      • Public Interest and Service
    Return to Fordham Law School
    X (Twitter) Facebook LinkedIn Instagram RSS
    Fordham Law News
    You are at:Home»Faculty»Big Auto’s High Court Jurisdictional Workaround Rebuffed

    Big Auto’s High Court Jurisdictional Workaround Rebuffed

    0
    By on March 26, 2021 Faculty, In the News

    Professor Howard Erichson shared his expert opinion on the recent decision from the Supreme Court in favor of plaintiffs in product defect and negligence suits.

    The justices on Thursday delivered a win to injured consumers and accident victims in a consolidated case involving allegedly defective Ford vehicles, saying big manufacturers like Ford with a global reach can expect to be sued in states where they do a substantial amount of business. The justices agreed that Ford’s “truckload of contacts” and business activities in Montana and Minnesota were enough for it to be sued in those states, rejecting the auto giant’s proposed workaround for existing rules on specific personal jurisdiction.
    …
    At the very least, the decision is a clear “common sense” win for plaintiffs who have hit some roadblocks in previous challenges before the high court, according to Fordham University School of Law professor Howard Erichson.
    “Some of the court’s recent decisions on personal jurisdiction have lost sight of the practical questions about choosing a forum and about allocating judicial power,” he said. “The court’s majority has sometimes seemed sadly uninterested in protecting access to justice for plaintiffs in civil lawsuits. So today’s decision came as a breath of fresh air, even if it addresses a rather technical question of civil procedure.”

    Read the full article.

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

    Related Posts

    Dan’s Papers: Prof. Jerry Goldfeder on How Lawyers are Becoming Bigger Players in Elections

    Dan’s Papers: Prof. Jerry Goldfeder on Voters Being Urged to Change Registration to Vote in Mayoral Election

    Above the Law: Prof. Thomas Lee on the Validity of Justice Department’s Misconduct Complaint Against U.S. District Court Chief Judge

    Comments are closed.

    • The Big Idea
    August 5, 2025

    The Big Idea: Who Counts (and Who Doesn’t) in the U.S. Census 

    March 31, 2025

    The Big Idea: Local Politics, Reform Prosecutors, and Reshaping Mass Incarceration

    March 3, 2025

    The Big Idea: Forced Labor, Global Supply Chains, and Workers’ Rights

    November 6, 2024

    The Big Idea: Partisanship, Perception, and Prosecutorial Power

    READ MORE

    About

    Fordham University - The Jesuit University of New York

    Founded in 1841, Fordham is the Jesuit University of New York, offering exceptional education distinguished by the Jesuit tradition to more than 15,100 students in its four undergraduate colleges and its six graduate and professional schools.
    Connect With Fordham
    © 2025 ThemeSphere. Designed by ThemeSphere.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.