Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Return to Fordham Law School
    X (Twitter) Facebook LinkedIn Instagram RSS
    Fordham Law News
    • Home
    • Law School News
    • In the News
    • Fordham Lawyer
    • Insider
      • Announcements
      • Class Notes
      • In Memoriam
    • For the Media
      • Media Contacts
    • News by Topic
      • Business and Financial Law
      • Clinics
      • Intellectual Property and Information Law
      • International and Human Rights Law
      • Legal Ethics and Professional Practice
      • National Security
      • Public Interest and Service
    Return to Fordham Law School
    X (Twitter) Facebook LinkedIn Instagram RSS
    Fordham Law News
    You are at:Home»Faculty»Why Are So Many Big Law Firms Chicken About Mandating Vaccines?

    Why Are So Many Big Law Firms Chicken About Mandating Vaccines?

    0
    By on August 4, 2021 Faculty, In the News

    Professor James Brudney was quoted in a Bloomberg Law column, which examined the behavior of major law firms in relation to COVID-19 vaccinations. The article also mentioned alumnus Eric Grossman ‘93, the chief legal officer at Morgan Stanley.

    So far, only a dozen or so major [law]firms have publicly declared that vaccinations are required for those setting foot in the office. It started slowly—with Davis Wright Tremaine taking the lead, followed later by Paul Weiss. It’s only in recent days that other firms joined in. Currently, the list also includes Arent Fox; Clifford Chance; Cooley; Davis Polk; Fenwick & West; Fried Frank; Hogan Lovells; Lowenstein Sandler; Mintz Levin; Reed Smith; and Weil Gotshal. And now that big-name companies are hopping on the vaccine bandwagon—including mighty Morgan Stanley whose legal chieftain Eric Grossman recently commanded his outside counsel to return to the office—more firms will likely join. That said, what a pathetic list so far!

    … 

    “There’s no legal impediment for mandating vaccines,” says James Brudney, a labor and employment professor at Fordham Law School, citing recent rulings involving Houston Methodist Hospital and Indiana University that overcame employee challenges to vaccine requirements.

    If there’s no legal impediment, why don’t firms get on the stick? “Well, they’re law firms,” says Brudney. “There could be concerns about respect for privacy and administrative costs to tracking compliance and managing exemption requests. Law firms are also concerned about claims for discrimination on religious or medical grounds.”

    All things considered, law firms prefer a “soft mandate,” explains Brudney, in which unvaccinated employees are required to take at least a weekly Covid test.

    Read the full article. 

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

    Related Posts

    Professor Catherine Powell Selected for Prestigious Princeton Fellowship

    Bloomberg Law: Prof. Bruce Green Says Rules of Professional Conduct Will Be Tested as KPMG Law Eyes National Reach

    Dan’s Papers: Prof. Jerry Goldfeder Quizzes Readers on New York Politics

    Comments are closed.

    • The Big Idea
    August 5, 2025

    The Big Idea: Who Counts (and Who Doesn’t) in the U.S. Census 

    March 31, 2025

    The Big Idea: Local Politics, Reform Prosecutors, and Reshaping Mass Incarceration

    March 3, 2025

    The Big Idea: Forced Labor, Global Supply Chains, and Workers’ Rights

    November 6, 2024

    The Big Idea: Partisanship, Perception, and Prosecutorial Power

    READ MORE

    About

    Fordham University - The Jesuit University of New York

    Founded in 1841, Fordham is the Jesuit University of New York, offering exceptional education distinguished by the Jesuit tradition to more than 15,100 students in its four undergraduate colleges and its six graduate and professional schools.
    Connect With Fordham
    © 2025 ThemeSphere. Designed by ThemeSphere.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.