Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Return to Fordham Law School
    X (Twitter) Facebook LinkedIn Instagram RSS
    Fordham Law News
    • Home
    • Law School News
    • In the News
    • Fordham Lawyer
    • Insider
      • Announcements
      • Class Notes
      • In Memoriam
    • For the Media
      • Media Contacts
    • News by Topic
      • Business and Financial Law
      • Clinics
      • Intellectual Property and Information Law
      • International and Human Rights Law
      • Legal Ethics and Professional Practice
      • National Security
      • Public Interest and Service
    Return to Fordham Law School
    X (Twitter) Facebook LinkedIn Instagram RSS
    Fordham Law News
    You are at:Home»Faculty»Slate: Prof. Deborah Denno Comments on Supreme Court Justice’s 2015 Endorsement for Execution by Firing Squad

    Slate: Prof. Deborah Denno Comments on Supreme Court Justice’s 2015 Endorsement for Execution by Firing Squad

    0
    By Erin Degregorio on May 12, 2025 Faculty, In the News

    In this Slate article, Fordham Law Professor Deborah Denno, death penalty expert and founding director of Fordham Law’s Neuroscience and Law Center, comments on Supreme Court Justice Sonya Sotomayor’s 2015 endorsement for execution by firing squad.

    In between Sotomayor’s two frequently cited endorsements of the firing squad, Professor Deborah Denno, this nation’s leading scholar about methods of execution, raised eyebrows when she called the justice’s 2015 assessment of the firing squad “compelling because they consider the calculation of the method’s cruelty versus visible violence through the eyes of a condemned inmate.”

    Denno argued that “More solid evidence suggests that a competently performed shooting may lead to nearly instant death,” while she conceded that “an incompetently performed shooting may well cause acute pain,” she insisted that such instances are “rare.”

    But Denno dismissed that concern, writing “such issues would not exist today. … Expert markspersons, situated so closely to the inmate, would be firmly secured and would not miss such a bold target on an inmate’s heart unless the miss was deliberate.”

    “The consensus of opinion concerning firing squads,” Denno concluded, “comports with Justice Sotomayor’s argument that they are swift and relatively pain free.”

    Read “A Progressive Justice Billed This Method of Execution as “Relatively Quick and Painless.” She Was Wrong.” on Slate.

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

    Related Posts

    Bloomberg Law: Prof. Bruce Green on Whether Judges Can Face Sanctions for the Kind of Errors They Find in Lawyers’ Work

    The New York Times: Prof. Bruce Green on Conflict of Interest in Epstein Scandal

    NBC New York: Prof. Martin S. Flaherty Provides Legal Opinion on Whether President Can Take Over New York City

    Comments are closed.

    • The Big Idea
    March 31, 2025

    The Big Idea: Local Politics, Reform Prosecutors, and Reshaping Mass Incarceration

    March 3, 2025

    The Big Idea: Forced Labor, Global Supply Chains, and Workers’ Rights

    November 6, 2024

    The Big Idea: Partisanship, Perception, and Prosecutorial Power

    October 3, 2024

    The Big Idea: How a Franchising Model Can Transform Worker Cooperatives

    READ MORE

    About

    Fordham University - The Jesuit University of New York

    Founded in 1841, Fordham is the Jesuit University of New York, offering exceptional education distinguished by the Jesuit tradition to more than 15,100 students in its four undergraduate colleges and its six graduate and professional schools.
    Connect With Fordham
    © 2025 ThemeSphere. Designed by ThemeSphere.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.